ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2018
Genetic variants of prospectively demonstrated phenocopies in
Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Germline predisposition in multiple myeloma.iScience · 2025Article
- Look Alike, Sound Alike: Phenocopies in Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- MLH1 intronic variants mapping to + 5 position of splice donor sites lead to deleterious effects on RNA splicing.Familial cancer · 2020Article
- Germline variants and phenotypic spectrum in a Canadian cohort of individuals with diffuse gastric cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020Article
- Results of multigene panel testing in familial cancer cases without genetic cause demonstrated by single gene testing.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- TheGenes · 2019Article
- Novel Genetic Markers for Early Detection of Elevated Breast Cancer Risk in Women.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Identification of genetic variants for clinical management of familial colorectal tumors.BMC medical genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn kindreds carrying
methodsWomen with BC or gynecological cancer who had tested negative for
resultsWe identified 48 women who were tested negative for their family's
conclusionAll women in breast or breast/ovarian cancer kindreds would benefit from being offered genetic testing irrespective of which causative genetic variants have been demonstrated in their relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.