Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29371654›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2018

Integrating new findings and examining clinical applications of pattern separation.

Stephanie L Leal, Michael A Yassa

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sharpened Visual Memory Representations Are Reflected in Inferotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie L LealHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Michael A YassaDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior and Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. myassa@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8635-1498
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

UC Irvine Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell CoreP50AG016573 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LAFERLA, FRANK M · 2000 to 2019
$37.0M
Structural & Network-Function Correlates of Fragmented Early-Life Across SpeciesP50MH096889 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BARAM, TALLIE Z. · 2013 to 2023
$25.4M
Neuroimaging biomarkers for cognitive decline in elderly with amyloid pathologyR01AG053555 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Michael A Yassa · 2017 to 2026
$17.0M
Neural Mechanisms of Emotional Memory Modulation in Major DepressionR01MH102392 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI YASSA, MICHAEL A · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Effect of tau pathology on memory consolidation in cognitively normal agingF32AG054116 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LEAL, STEPHANIE L. · 2016 to 2017
$112k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG054116NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016573NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053555NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH096889NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pattern separation, the ability to independently represent and store similar experiences, is a crucial facet of episodic memory. Growing evidence suggests that the hippocampus possesses unique circuitry that is computationally capable of resolving mnemonic interference by using pattern separation. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of this process and evaluate the caveats and limitations of linking across animal and human studies. We summarize clinical and translational studies using methods that are sensitive to pattern separation impairments, an approach that stems from the fact that the hippocampus is a major site of disruption in many brain disorders. We critically evaluate the assumptions that guide fundamental and translational studies in this area. Finally, we suggest guidelines for future research and offer ways to overcome potential interpretational challenges to increase the utility of pattern separation as a construct that can further understanding of both memory processes and brain disease.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMemory, EpisodicModels, NeurologicalAnimalsHippocampusHumans

Identifiers

PMID29371654
PMCPMC5898810
OpenAlexW2794318307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.