ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018
Clinical utility gene card for McArdle disease.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation of the First Human In Vitro Model for McArdle Disease Based on iPSC Technology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- [McArdle's disease in four pediatric patients. Diagnostic algorithm for exercise intolerance].Revista de neurologia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Name of the disease (synonyms) McArdle disease (glycogenosis type V; glycogen storage disease V (GSDV); PYGM deficiency; muscle glycogen phosphorylase deficiency; myophosphorylase deficiency). OMIM# of the disease #232600. Name of the analysed genes or DNA/chromosome segments Muscle glycogen phosphoryalse (PYGM). OMIM# of the gene(s) #608455.Review of the analytical and clinical validity as well as of the clinical utility of DNA-based testing for variants in the PYGM gene(s) in⊠ diagnostic,⊠ predictive and⊠ prenatal settings and for⊠ risk assessment in relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.