Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29371576›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Innate Immunity to Mucosal Candida Infections.

Akash Verma, Sarah L Gaffen, Marc Swidergall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Two New Triterpenoid Saponins with Antifungal Activity fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. The Interplay betweenMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akash VermaDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. akash.verma@pitt.edu.
Sarah L GaffenDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. sarah.gaffen@pitt.edu.
Marc SwidergallDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, USA. mswidergall@labiomed.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-6267

Funding

Host and Fungal Regulation of Type 17 Immunity to Oral CandidiasisR37DE022550 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Sarah L Gaffen · 2017 to 2026
$5.6M
IL-23/STAT3-Driven Oral Immune Responses to Candida albicansR01DE023815 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GAFFEN, SARAH L · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Novel Candida albicans host receptors during infection and immune responseK99DE026856 · NIDCR · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SWIDERGALL, MARC · 2017 to 2018
$267k
NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE026856NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023815NIDCR NIH HHS R37 DE022550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal epithelial tissues are exposed to high numbers of microbes, including commensal fungi, and are able to distinguish between those that are avirulent and those that cause disease. Epithelial cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to defend against colonization and invasion by

Indexed as

alarminsantifungal immunityantimicrobial peptidesepithelial cellsIL-17innate T cellsoropharyngeal candidiasisvulvovaginal candidiasis

Identifiers

PMID29371576
PMCPMC5753162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.