Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29371537›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Fusarium: A Practical Approach.

Abdullah M S Al-Hatmi, Ilse Curfs-Breuker, G Sybren de Hoog, Jacques F Meis, Paul E Verweij

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Infection and drug resistance · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antifungal susceptibility, clinical findings, and biofilm resistance of Fusarium species causing keratitis: a challenge for disease control.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Antarctic Streptomyces: Promising biocontrol agents for combatingBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The First Case ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. In Vitro Evaluation of the Antifungal Effect of AgNPs onNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdullah M S Al-HatmiWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, PO Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. abdullaalhatmi@gmail.com.
Ilse Curfs-BreukerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. i.breuker@cwz.nl.
G Sybren de HoogWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, PO Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.hoog@westerdijkinstitute.nl.
Jacques F MeisCentre of Expertise in Mycology Radboud University Medical Centre, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. jacques.meis@gmail.com.
Paul E VerweijCentre of Expertise in Mycology Radboud University Medical Centre, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Paul.Verweij@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro susceptibility testing of

Indexed as

clinical laboratoryCLSIEtestEUCASTFusariumsusceptibility test

Identifiers

PMID29371537
PMCPMC5715922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.