Trial reportThe oncologist2018
Chemoprevention in Patients with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome: Lessons Learned.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sirolimus for Colon Polyposis in PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Progress report: Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.Familial cancer · 2024Review
- Cancer Risk of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and Treatment Experience: A Chinese Medical Center.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023Review
- Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: Experience with 566 Chinese cases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Chemoprevention in hereditary digestive neoplasia: A comprehensive review.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Cronkhite-Canada syndrome: A case report and review of the literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Altered Gut Microbiota in Patients With Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and the Role of Imaging: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Associated Cancers.Cancers · 2021Review
- Hereditary Polyposis Syndromes.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
lessons learnedMotivating patients to enroll in chemopreventive studies is challenging.Chemoprevention with toxic drugs is not feasible.
backgroundLKB1 mutations are the underlying genetic abnormality causing Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and are a potential target for everolimus. In this phase II study, the efficacy of everolimus on polyp and tumor growth in PJS patients was investigated.
methodsAdult patients with a proven LKB1 mutation and who were suitable for everolimus treatment were included in two different PJS cohorts: (a) patients with unresectable malignancies and (b) patients with high-risk polyps. Treatment in both groups was oral everolimus, 10 mg daily. Response rates were primary endpoints for both cohorts.
resultsBetween October 2011 and April 2016, only two patients were enrolled, one in each cohort. A 49-year-old patient with advanced pancreatic cancer in cohort 1 was progressive after 2 months. A 52-year-old male patient in cohort 2 experienced severe toxicity and refused treatment after 4 months, even though endoscopy suggested stabilization of polyps. Adverse events included dental inflammations, mucositis, and rash. In 2016, the trial was aborted for lack of accrual, despite extensive accrual efforts in an area where PJS is highly prevalent and care is highly centralized.
conclusionDue to accrual problems, no conclusions can be drawn about the value of everolimus in PJS treatment, questioning the feasibility of this agent for chemoprevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.