Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29371435›Full record

ArticleStroke2018

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Enhances Stable Plasticity and Generalization of Stroke Recovery.

Eric C Meyers, Bleyda R Solorzano, Justin James, Patrick D Ganzer, Elaine S Lai, Robert L Rennaker, Michael P Kilgard, Seth A Hays

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04088565 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Underlying Enhanced Motor Control in Humans

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2019 to 2021Enrolled26ConditionsStrokeArmsPaired-Associative Stimulation (PAS), Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS), Sham Stimulation
NCT04088578 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Mechanisms of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation Underlying Enhanced Motor Control in Humans

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2019 to 2021Enrolled26ConditionsStroke, AcuteArmsTraining, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Sham Stimulation
NCT04534556 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Wireless Nerve Stimulation Device To Enhance Recovery After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaylor Research InstituteRan2021 to 2027Enrolled42ConditionsStroke, Chronic Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis, Ischemic StrokeArmsActive Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Placebo Vagus Nerve Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Good vibrations: Sternal vibration enhances white matter density and interoceptive awareness.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Eric C MeyersFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson. ecm081000@utdallas.edu.
Bleyda R SolorzanoFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Justin JamesFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Patrick D GanzerFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Elaine S LaiFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Robert L RennakerFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Michael P KilgardFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
Seth A HaysFrom the Texas Biomedical Device Center (E.C.M., B.R.S., J.J., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science (E.C.M., P.D.G., E.S.L., R.L.R., M.P.K., S.A.H.), and School of Behavioral Brain Sciences (J.J., R.L.R., M.P.K.), University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.
MACOM (United States) · US

Funding

ResourceP40OD010996 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2024
$11.0M
Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired with Rehabilitative Training to Enhance PlasticityR01NS085167 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KILGARD, MICHAEL P, RENNAKER, ROBERT L · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Evaluation of the Neuromodulatory Mechanisms of Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Improve Motor Rehabilitation after StrokeR01NS094384 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HAYS, SETH ALANSON · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIH HHS P40 OD010996NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085167NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeChronic impairment of the arm and hand is a common consequence of stroke. Animal and human studies indicate that brief bursts of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in conjunction with rehabilitative training improve recovery of motor function after stroke. In this study, we tested whether VNS could promote generalization, long-lasting recovery, and structural plasticity in motor networks.

methodsRats were trained on a fully automated, quantitative task that measures forelimb supination. On task proficiency, unilateral cortical and subcortical ischemic lesions were administered. One week after ischemic lesion, rats were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of rehabilitative training on the supination task with or without VNS. Rats then underwent 4 weeks of testing on a task assessing forelimb strength to test generalization of recovery. Finally, the durability of VNS benefits was tested on the supination task 2 months after the cessation of VNS. After the conclusion of behavioral testing, viral tracing was performed to assess synaptic connectivity in motor networks.

resultsVNS enhances plasticity in corticospinal motor networks to increase synaptic connectivity to musculature of the rehabilitated forelimb. Adding VNS more than doubled the benefit of rehabilitative training, and the improvements lasted months after the end of VNS. Pairing VNS with supination training also significantly improved performance on a similar, but untrained task that emphasized volitional forelimb strength, suggesting generalization of forelimb recovery.

conclusionsThis study provides the first evidence that VNS paired with rehabilitative training after stroke (1) doubles long-lasting recovery on a complex task involving forelimb supination, (2) doubles recovery on a simple motor task that was not paired with VNS, and (3) enhances structural plasticity in motor networks.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityVagus Nerve StimulationAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHindlimbMotor CortexMuscle StrengthRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStrokeforelimbratsrehabilitationsupinationvagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID29371435
PMCPMC6454573
OpenAlexW2789481298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.