Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29371320›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Antagonistic Interactions Between Microsaccades and Evidence Accumulation Processes During Decision Formation.

Gerard M Loughnane, Daniel P Newman, Sarita Tamang, Simon P Kelly, Redmond G O'Connell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Attention deficits in Amblyopia.Current opinion in psychology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Directing Voluntary Temporal Attention Increases Fixational Stability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. The Role of Neuronal Oscillations in Visual Active Sensing.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerard M LoughnaneTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland, loughnag@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-5294
Daniel P NewmanSchool of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute for Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-1876
Sarita TamangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10031, and.
Simon P KellyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10031, and.
Redmond G O'ConnellTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their small size, microsaccades can impede stimulus detections if executed at inopportune times. Although it has been shown that microsaccades evoke both inhibitory and excitatory responses across different visual regions, their impact on the higher-level neural decision processes that bridge sensory responses to action selection has yet to be examined. Here, we show that when human observers monitor stimuli for subtle feature changes, the occurrence of microsaccades long after (up to 800 ms) change onset predicts slower reaction times and this is accounted for by momentary suppression of neural signals at each key stage of decision formation: visual evidence encoding, evidence accumulation, and motor preparation. Our data further reveal that, independent of the timing of the change events, the onset of neural decision formation coincides with a systematic inhibition of microsaccade production, persisting until the perceptual report is executed. Our combined behavioral and neural measures highlight antagonistic interactions between microsaccade occurrence and evidence accumulation during visual decision-making tasks.

Indexed as

AdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSaccadesVisual PerceptionCPPdecision makingEEGfixational eye movementsmicrosaccadessaccades

Identifiers

PMID29371320
PMCPMC6596275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.