Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29371285›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Best practices for community-engaged participatory research with Pacific Islander communities in the USA and USAPI: protocol for a scoping review.

Pearl Anna McElfish, Britni L Ayers, Rachel S Purvis, Christopher R Long, Ka'imi Sinclair, Monica Esquivel, Susan C Steelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perceived Barriers and Benefits of COVID-19 Testing among Pacific Islanders on Guam.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pearl Anna McElfishOffice of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Britni L AyersOffice of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Rachel S PurvisOffice of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Christopher R LongOffice of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-7790
Ka'imi SinclairInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health (IREACH), College of Nursing, Washington State University, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Monica EsquivelDepartment of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Susan C SteelmanDivision of Academic Affairs, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Library, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCommunity-based participatory research is a partnership approach to research that seeks to equally involve community members, organisational representatives and academic partners throughout the research process in a coequal and mutually beneficial partnership. To date, no published article has synthesised the best practices for community-based participatory research practices with Pacific Islanders. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The reviewers will examine studies' titles, abstracts and full text, comparing eligibility to address discrepancies. For each eligible study, data extraction will be executed by two reviewers and one confirmation coder, comparing extracted data to address any discrepancies. Eligible data will be synthesised and reported in a narrative review assessing coverage and gaps in existing literature related to community-based participatory research with Pacific Islanders. DISCUSSION AND DISSEMINATION: The purpose of this review is to identify best practices used when conducting community-based participatory research with Pacific Islanders; it will also extrapolate where the gaps are in the existing literature. This will be the first scoping review on community-based participatory research with Pacific Islanders. To facilitate dissemination, the results of this scoping review will be submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and shared with community-based participatory research stakeholders.

Indexed as

Native Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderPractice Guidelines as TopicCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicUnited Statescommunity-based participatory researchcommunity-engagedPacific Islandersscoping review

Identifiers

PMID29371285
PMCPMC5786128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.