Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370837›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Utilization of health care services among Medicare beneficiaries who visit federally qualified health centers.

Tara A Lavelle, Adam J Rose, Justin W Timbie, Claude M Setodji, Suzanne G Wensky, Katherine D Giuriceo, Mark W Friedberg, Rosalie Malsberger, Katherine L Kahn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Teleophthalmology and Inequities in Diabetic Eye Disease at Safety Net Hospitals.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Postoperative hand therapy and the 2018 Medicare therapy cap repeal: Appraising cost and use changes.Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara A LavelleRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.
Adam J RoseRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA. arose@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-6155
Justin W TimbieRAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA.
Claude M SetodjiRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Suzanne G WenskyCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Katherine D GiuriceoCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark W FriedbergRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.
Rosalie MalsbergerRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.
Katherine L KahnRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Contract: HHSM-500-2005-00028I, Task # T0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have disagreed on whether patients who receive primary care from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) have different utilization patterns than patients who receive care elsewhere. Our objective was to compare patterns of healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries who received primary care from FQHCs and Medicare beneficiaries who received primary care from another source.

methodsWe compared characteristics and ambulatory, emergency department (ED), and inpatient utilization during 2013 between 130,637 Medicare beneficiaries who visited an FQHC for the majority of their primary care in 2013 (FQHC users) and a random sample of 1,000,000 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries who did not visit an FQHC (FQHC non-users). We then created a propensity-matched sample of 130,569 FQHC users and 130,569 FQHC non-users to account for differences in observable patient characteristics between the two groups and repeated all comparisons.

resultsBefore matching, the two samples differed in terms of age (42% below age 65 for FQHC users vs. 16% among FQHC non-users, p < 0.001 for all comparisons), disability (52% vs. 24%), eligibility for Medicaid (56% vs. 21%), severe mental health disorders (17% vs. 10%), and substance abuse disorders (6% vs. 3%). FQHC users had fewer ambulatory visits to primary care or specialist providers (10.0 vs. 12.0 per year), more ED visits (1.2 vs. 0.8), and fewer hospitalizations (0.3 vs. 0.4). In the matched sample, FQHC users still had slightly lower utilization of ambulatory visits to primary care or specialist providers (10.0 vs. 11.2) and slightly higher utilization of ED visits (1.2 vs. 1.0), compared to FQHC users. Hospitalization rates between the two groups were similar (0.3 vs. 0.3).

conclusionsIn this population of Medicare FFS beneficiaries, FQHC users had slightly lower utilization of ambulatory visits and slightly higher utilization of ED visits, compared to FQHC non-users, after accounting for differences in case mix. This study suggests that FQHC care and non-FQHC care are associated with broadly similar levels of healthcare utilization among Medicare FFS beneficiaries.

Indexed as

MedicarePrimary Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis-Related GroupsEmergency Service, HospitalFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited StatesYoung Adulthealth care utilizationMedicaresafety-net care

Identifiers

PMID29370837
PMCPMC5785864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.