Trial reportRespiratory research2018
Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol plus umeclidinium using two inhalers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized non-inferiority study.
Trial report in Respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIIB, 24-week Randomised, Double-blind Study to Compare 'Closed' Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) With 'Open' Triple Therapy (FF/VI + UMEC), in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Comparative Effects of Triple Inhaled Therapy With Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Versus Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol on Small Airway Disease in COPD Patients: A Randomized Crossover Study
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus other bronchodilators in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of single inhaler triple therapy vs single inhaler dual therapy or separate triple therapy for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Pooled it
- Triple therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Pooled it
- Triple therapy for COPD: a crude analysis from a systematic review of the evidence.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseasePooled it
- Comparisons of Efficacy and Safety between Triple (Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting Beta-Agonist) Therapies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseasesPooled it
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium Bromide/Vilanterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2020Trial
- Effect of background long-acting betaInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseTrial
- Real-World Effectiveness of Single-Inhaler Triple Treatment Through Assorted Respiratory Outcomes When Switched From Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies (RESTART): A Prospective Cohort Study of Korean Patients With COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Observational
- Triple Therapy in COPD in Real Life: Is It Better to Use Single or Multiple Inhalers?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Adherence to single inhaler triple therapy and digital inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a literature review and protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TRICOLON study).BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Review
- Eligibility of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for inclusion in randomised control trials investigating triple therapy: a study using routinely collected data.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Advancing Treatment Strategies: A Comprehensive Review of Drug Delivery Innovations for Chronic Inflammatory Respiratory Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Use and persistence of single and multiple inhaler triple therapy prescribed for patients with COPD in France: a retrospective study on THIN database (OPTI study).BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Article
- Comparison of treatment persistence, adherence, and risk of exacerbation in patients with COPD treated with single-inhalerFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- ICS/Ultra LABA in the Treatment of Obstructive Airway Diseases: A Consensus of Indian Experts.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Comparative efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapies for COPD: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Dual Bronchodilator in the Era of Triple Therapy.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Review
- A Delphi Consensus Document on the Use of Single-Inhaler Fixed-Dose Triple Therapies in COPD Patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
- COPD from an everyday primary care point of view.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 μg has been shown to improve lung function and health status, and reduce exacerbations, versus budesonide/formoterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated the non-inferiority of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI + UMEC using two inhalers.
methodsEligible patients with COPD (aged ≥40 years; ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the 12 months before screening) were randomized (1:1; stratified by the number of long-acting bronchodilators [0, 1 or 2] per day during run-in) to receive 24-week FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg and placebo or FF/VI 100/25 μg + UMEC 62.5 μg; all treatments/placebo were delivered using the ELLIPTA inhaler once-daily in the morning. Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
resultsA total of 1055 patients (844 [80%] of whom were enrolled on combination maintenance therapy) were randomized to receive FF/UMEC/VI (n = 527) or FF/VI + UMEC (n = 528). Mean change from baseline in trough FEV
conclusionsSingle-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) is non-inferior to two inhalers (FF/VI + UMEC) on trough FEV
trial registrationGSK study CTT200812; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02729051 (submitted 31 March 2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.