SynthesisBMC health services research2018
The use of external change agents to promote quality improvement and organizational change in healthcare organizations: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Coaching on Process Outcomes in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- OPTIMISE: a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of an intervention to improve primary care for refugees in Australia.The Medical journal of Australia · 2021Trial
- Using Lean-Facilitation to Improve Quality of Hepatitis C Testing in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- Implementation and adoption of a health insurance support tool in the electronic health record: a mixed methods analysis within a randomized trial.BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- Raising Awareness of Oral Care Through Co-Creation: A Qualitative Evaluation Study With Patients and Healthcare Professionals in a Hospital Setting.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- What influenced the use of embedded genetic expertise by non-genetic clinicians: a qualitative study using the diffusion of innovations theory and theoretical domains framework.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Process and Strategies for Implementing an Antenatal Psychosocial Clinical Decision Support System Within an Inter-Organisational Care Context: The Born in Belgium Professionals Platform.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Managing urinary incontinence: evaluating the role of practice facilitators in enhancing quality improvement and digital integration in primary care.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Employees in the municipal healthcare service experiences with participation in quality improvement collaboratives and the use of the Quality Improvement Model: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Building capability for clinician-led genomic change: insights from use and non-use of a theory-informed model for change.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Dementia Rehabilitation Training for General Practitioners and Practice Nurses: Does It Make a Difference?Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Communicate to Care: Implementing Health Literacy in a Pediatric Ears, Nose, and Throat Clinic.Health literacy research and practice · 2024Article
- Virtual facilitation best practices and research priorities: a scoping review.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- How the experiences of implementation support recipients contribute to implementation outcomes.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- A longitudinal mixed methods evaluation of a facilitation training intervention to build implementation capacity.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- "The project did not come to us with a solution": Perspectives of research teams on implementing a study about electronic health record-embedded individualized pain plans for emergency department treatment of vaso-occlusive episodes in adults with sickle cell disease.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Barriers and enablers for the implementation of trauma-informed care in healthcare settings: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2023Review
- Impact of externally facilitated continuous quality improvement cohorts on Advanced Access to support primary healthcare teams: protocol for a quasi-randomized cluster trial.BMC primary care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExternal change agents can play an essential role in healthcare organizational change efforts. This systematic review examines the role that external change agents have played within the context of multifaceted interventions designed to promote organizational change in healthcare-specifically, in primary care settings.
methodsWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Academic Search Premier Databases in July 2016 for randomized trials published (in English) between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2016 in which external agents were part of multifaceted organizational change strategies. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 477 abstracts were identified and screened by 2 authors. Full text articles of 113 studies were reviewed. Twenty-one of these studies were selected for inclusion.
resultsAcademic detailing (AD) is the most prevalently used organizational change strategy employed as part of multi-component implementation strategies. Out of 21 studies, nearly all studies integrate some form of audit and feedback into their interventions. Eleven studies that included practice facilitation into their intervention reported significant effects in one or more primary outcomes.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that practice facilitation with regular, tailored follow up is a powerful component of a successful organizational change strategy. Academic detailing alone or combined with audit and feedback alone is ineffective without intensive follow up. Provision of educational materials and use of audit and feedback are often integral components of multifaceted implementation strategies. However, we didn't find examples where those relatively limited strategies were effective as standalone interventions. System-level support through technology (such as automated reminders or alerts) is potentially helpful, but must be carefully tailored to clinic needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.