Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370784›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

Students´ perception of interprofessional education in the bachelor programme "Interprofessional Health Care" in Heidelberg, Germany: an exploratory case study.

Cornelia Mahler, Veronika Schwarzbeck, Johanna Mink, Katja Goetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cornelia MahlerDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius-Arkaden, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany. cornelia.mahler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6601-0602
Veronika SchwarzbeckDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius-Arkaden, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johanna MinkDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Marsilius-Arkaden, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja GoetzInstitue of Family Medicine, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional education is receiving increased attention worldwide. This has led to the development of a bachelor programme "Interprofessional Health Care" at the University of Heidelberg, Germany beginning in the winter semester 2011. Aim of this study was to evaluate the students' perception of this innovative programme regarding interprofessional learning.

methodsAn exploratory case study was conducted. A semi-structured guideline was developed and seven focus groups were performed with the students of the first three cohorts in 2012-2014. Data was transcribed and analyzed using content analysis leading to main categories, one of which was titled "interprofessional learning". This article presents the results focussing on the students' experiences regarding interprofessional education and learning during their first two semesters of the programme.

resultsFour main categories related to interprofessional learning were developed inductively. Students assessed "interprofessional learning" in general as positive and wished to encounter a more intense experience and collaboration with different health professions during their studies. Students reported to benefit from the programme due to a better understanding of other professions and their different perspectives. They described decreased hesitance to approach other health professions in every day practice. Results are in line with the four domains of the Interprofessional Core Competencies.

conclusionAll in all students at an early stage recognized the benefit of interprofessional learning for their studies and their everyday work in practice showing the way forward for the bachelor programme and encouraging more interprofessional encounters with students from other health care programmes.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsLearningAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCooperative BehaviorFocus GroupsGermanyHealth OccupationsHumansPerceptionQualitative ResearchStudents, Health OccupationsInterprofessional competenciesInterprofessional education; student perceptionInterprofessional health care; focus group interviewsQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID29370784
PMCPMC5785847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.