Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370768›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2018

Cost-effectiveness of increasing vaccination in high-risk adults aged 18-64 Years: a model-based decision analysis.

Angela R Wateska, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Richard K Zimmerman, Kenneth J Smith, Chyongchiou J Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angela R WateskaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Meyran Ave., Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Mary Patricia NowalkDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Richard K ZimmermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kenneth J SmithDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Meyran Ave., Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. smithkj2@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-566X
Chyongchiou J LinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Analyzing Adult Pneumococcal Vaccination Implementation in the UnderservedR01AI116575 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SMITH, KENNETH J · 2016 to 2023
$2.8M
A Vaccination SOP Toolkit in Diverse Practices Implemented & Tested with RE-AIMU01IP000662 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ZIMMERMAN, RICHARD K · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
CDC HHS U01 IP000662National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01 AI116575NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000662NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116575NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NIH HHS UL1TR000005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults aged 18-64 years with comorbid conditions are at high risk for complications of certain vaccine-preventable diseases, including influenza and pneumococcal disease. The 4 Pillars™ Practice Transformation Program (4 Pillars Program) increases uptake of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, influenza vaccine and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine by 5-10% among adults with high-risk medical conditions, but its cost-effectiveness is unknown.

methodsA decision tree model estimated the cost-effectiveness of implementing the 4 Pillars Program in primary care practices compared to no program for a population of adults 18-64 years of age at high risk of illness complications over a 10 year time horizon. Vaccination rates and intervention costs were derived from a randomized controlled cluster trial in diverse practices in 2 U.S. cities. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

resultsFrom a third-party payer perspective, which considers direct medical costs, the 4 Pillars Program cost $28,301 per quality-adjusted life year gained; from a societal perspective, which adds direct nonmedical and indirect costs, the program was cost saving and more effective than no intervention. Cost effectiveness results favoring the program were robust in sensitivity analyses. From a public health standpoint, the model predicted that the intervention reduced influenza cases by 1.4%, with smaller decreases in pertussis and pneumococcal disease cases.

conclusionThe 4 Pillars Practice Transformation Program is an economically reasonable, and perhaps cost saving, strategy for protecting the health of adults aged < 65 years with high-risk medical conditions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesHumansImmunocompromised HostInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMiddle AgedPertussis VaccinePneumococcal InfectionsPneumococcal VaccinesPrimary Health CarePublic HealthQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk FactorsInfluenza VaccinesPertussis VaccinePneumococcal VaccinesAdult vaccinationHigh-risk adultsInfluenza vaccinePneumococcal vaccinePrimary careTdap vaccine

Identifiers

PMID29370768
PMCPMC5785845
OpenAlexW2790610543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.