Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370766›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2018

Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation.

Irene Aasmul, Bettina S Husebo, Elisabeth Flo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02238652 (Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02238652 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (The KOSMOS Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2014 to 2015Enrolled560ConditionsQuality of LifeArmsCommunication, Systematic Pain Assessment and Treatment, Medication Review, Occupational therapy, Safety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irene AasmulCentre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box: 7804, Bergen, Norway. Irene.aasmul@uib.no.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-6095
Bettina S HuseboCentre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box: 7804, Bergen, Norway.
Elisabeth FloCentre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box: 7804, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 222113/H10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) is the repeated communication and decision-making process between the patient, family, and healthcare professionals. This study describes an ACP intervention in nursing homes and evaluates the outcomes of the implementation process.

methodsThe ACP intervention was part of a 4-month complex, cluster randomized controlled trial (COSMOS). 37 Norwegian nursing homes with 72 units (1 cluster = 1 unit) and 765 patients were invited to participate and eligible units were randomised to the intervention group or control. Nursing home staff in the intervention group was offered a standardized education programme to learn early and repeated communication with patients and families and to implement ACP in their units. We used a train-the-trainer approach to educate staff in the units, supported by regular telephone calls and a midway seminar after two months. Individual patient logs consisting of different communication deliverables were used to evaluate the implementation process. Supported by Qualitative Content Analyses, we identified facilitators and barriers of the ACP implementation based on feedback during midway seminars and individual patient logs.

resultsThe ACP intervention was conducted in 36 NH units (n = 297); 105 healthcare providers participated at the education seminar prior to the study, and 3-4 employees from each unit participated in the midway seminar. NH staff reported the educational material relevant for the implementation strategy. The patient logs showed that ACP was successfully implemented in 62% (n = 183) of the patients using our predefined implementation criteria. The staff emphasized the clear communication of the relevance of ACP addressed to leaders and staff as important facilitators, along with the clearly defined routines, roles and responsibilities. Identified barriers included lack of competence, perceived lack of time, and conflicting culture and staff opinions.

conclusionMonthly communication with the family was the most frequently conducted communication, and the predefined criteria of successfully implemented ACP were largely achieved. Nursing home routines and engagement of leaders and staff were crucial facilitators, whereas lack of time and competence reduced the implementation success.

trial registrationThe COSMOS-trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02238652 ) July 7th, 2014.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationDecision MakingFemaleHealth PersonnelHomes for the AgedHumansMaleNorwayNursing HomesOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAdvance care planningEducationImplementationNursing homeStaff trainingTrain-the-trainer

Identifiers

PMID29370766
PMCPMC5785831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.