Trial reportBMC geriatrics2018
Description of an advance care planning intervention in nursing homes: outcomes of the process evaluation.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02238652 (Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (The KOSMOS Study)
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Setting Priorities to Inform Assessment of Care Homes' Readiness to Participate in Healthcare Innovation: A Systematic Mapping Review and Consensus Process.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- End-Users and Caregivers' Involvement in Health Interventional Research Carried Out in Geriatric Facilities: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- The longitudinal association between the use of antihypertensive medications and 24-hour sleep in nursing homes: results from the randomized controlled COSMOS trial.BMC geriatrics · 2021Trial
- Three Case-Based Approaches to Preimplementation Evaluation in Nursing Homes: Understanding Enablers, Barriers, and Implementation Strategies.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a novel educational intervention for mental health staff on advance care planning with older people with mental illness.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Do process evaluations open up the 'black box' of implementation interventions in health care? A scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- EMTReK Model for Advance Care Planning in Long-Term Care: Qualitative Findings from mySupport Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patients' experiences of quality in palliative care and advance care planning in primary care: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Proactive end-of-life conversations in residential care homes: a qualitative interview study exploring residents' and family members' experiences.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Public attitudes to emergency care treatment plans: a population survey of Great Britain.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Long-Term Effects of Individual-Focused and Team-Based Training on Health Professionals' Intention to Have Serious Illness Conversations: A Cluster Randomised Trial.Journal of CME · 2024Article
- Dying at "home" - a qualitative study of end-of-life care in rural Northern Norway from the perspective of health care professionals.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Implementation of Goals of Care Communication Innovation Among Nursing Homes: A Multiple Case Study Design.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2022Article
- Use, usability, and impact of a card-based conversation tool to support communication about end-of-life preferences in residential elder care - a qualitative study of staff experiences.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Who should talk with patients about their end-of-life care wishes? A nationwide survey of the Hungarian population.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) is the repeated communication and decision-making process between the patient, family, and healthcare professionals. This study describes an ACP intervention in nursing homes and evaluates the outcomes of the implementation process.
methodsThe ACP intervention was part of a 4-month complex, cluster randomized controlled trial (COSMOS). 37 Norwegian nursing homes with 72 units (1 cluster = 1 unit) and 765 patients were invited to participate and eligible units were randomised to the intervention group or control. Nursing home staff in the intervention group was offered a standardized education programme to learn early and repeated communication with patients and families and to implement ACP in their units. We used a train-the-trainer approach to educate staff in the units, supported by regular telephone calls and a midway seminar after two months. Individual patient logs consisting of different communication deliverables were used to evaluate the implementation process. Supported by Qualitative Content Analyses, we identified facilitators and barriers of the ACP implementation based on feedback during midway seminars and individual patient logs.
resultsThe ACP intervention was conducted in 36 NH units (n = 297); 105 healthcare providers participated at the education seminar prior to the study, and 3-4 employees from each unit participated in the midway seminar. NH staff reported the educational material relevant for the implementation strategy. The patient logs showed that ACP was successfully implemented in 62% (n = 183) of the patients using our predefined implementation criteria. The staff emphasized the clear communication of the relevance of ACP addressed to leaders and staff as important facilitators, along with the clearly defined routines, roles and responsibilities. Identified barriers included lack of competence, perceived lack of time, and conflicting culture and staff opinions.
conclusionMonthly communication with the family was the most frequently conducted communication, and the predefined criteria of successfully implemented ACP were largely achieved. Nursing home routines and engagement of leaders and staff were crucial facilitators, whereas lack of time and competence reduced the implementation success.
trial registrationThe COSMOS-trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02238652 ) July 7th, 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.