Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370750›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

CONFOLD2: improved contact-driven ab initio protein structure modeling.

Badri Adhikari, Jianlin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Contact-Assisted Threading in Low-Homology Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A combinedCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Protein Design with Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Badri AdhikariDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, 63121, MO, USA.
Jianlin ChengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, 65211, MO, USA. chengji@missouri.edu.

Funding

Integrated Prediction of Protein Struture at 1D, 2D and 3D LevelsR01GM093123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093123NIH HHS R01GM093123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContact-guided protein structure prediction methods are becoming more and more successful because of the latest advances in residue-residue contact prediction. To support contact-driven structure prediction, effective tools that can quickly build tertiary structural models of good quality from predicted contacts need to be developed.

resultsWe develop an improved contact-driven protein modelling method, CONFOLD2, and study how it may be effectively used for ab initio protein structure prediction with predicted contacts as input. It builds models using various subsets of input contacts to explore the fold space under the guidance of a soft square energy function, and then clusters the models to obtain the top five models. CONFOLD2 obtains an average reconstruction accuracy of 0.57 TM-score for the 150 proteins in the PSICOV contact prediction dataset. When benchmarked on the CASP11 contacts predicted using CONSIP2 and CASP12 contacts predicted using Raptor-X, CONFOLD2 achieves a mean TM-score of 0.41 on both datasets.

conclusionCONFOLD2 allows to quickly generate top five structural models for a protein sequence when its secondary structures and contacts predictions at hand. The source code of CONFOLD2 is publicly available at https://github.com/multicom-toolbox/CONFOLD2/ .

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinInternetProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsProteinsCONFOLDContactsModel selectionProtein folding

Identifiers

PMID29370750
PMCPMC5784681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.