ArticleBMC genomics2018
A SNP panel for identification of DNA and RNA specimens.
Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Approaches to Thoroughbred Horse Identification in Diverse Sample Types Using Multiplexed SNP-PCR Sequencing Panels.Animal genetics · 2026Article
- Assessment of forensic individual identification and kinship analysis using transcript SNPs derived from public transcriptome sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genotyping from targeted NGS data based on a small set of SNPs correctly matches patient samples.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Sample Tracking Tool: A Comprehensive Approach Based on OpenArray Technology and R Scripting for Genomic Sample Monitoring.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A likelihood ratio framework for inferring close kinship from dynamically selected SNPs.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Selective Effect of DNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification on Transcriptional Genetic Variations in East Asian Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Detection and evaluation of parameters influencing the identification of heterozygous-enriched regions in Holstein cattle based on SNP chip or whole-genome sequence data.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Assessing Privacy Vulnerabilities in Genetic Data Sets: Scoping Review.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Genetic sex validation for sample tracking in next-generation sequencing clinical testing.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Vaccinomics: Paving the Way for Personalized Immunization.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Review
- Genomic screening methodology not requiring barcoding: Single nucleotide polymorphism-based, mixed-cell screening (SMICS).Genomics · 2023Article
- SNP analysis of challenging bone DNA samples using the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel: facts and artefacts.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- A pipeline for sample tagging of whole genome bisulfite sequencing data using genotypes of whole genome sequencing.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Article
- Whole exome sequencing identifies two novel variants in PHEX and DMP1 in Malaysian children with hypophosphatemic rickets.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Privacy-aware estimation of relatedness in admixed populations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- SVAT: Secure outsourcing of variant annotation and genotype aggregation.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Forensic characterization of 124 SNPs in the central Indian population using precision ID Identity Panel through next-generation sequencing.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Identifying individuals using proteomics: are we there yet?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Forensic Feature Exploration and Comprehensive Genetic Insights Into Yugu Ethnic Minority and Northern Han PopulationFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSNP panels that uniquely identify an individual are useful for genetic and forensic research. Previously recommended SNP panels are based on DNA profiles and mostly contain intragenic SNPs. With the increasing interest in RNA expression profiles, we aimed for establishing a SNP panel for both DNA and RNA-based genotyping.
resultsTo determine a small set of SNPs with maximally discriminative power, genotype calls were obtained from DNA and blood-derived RNA sequencing data belonging to healthy, geographically dispersed, Dutch individuals. SNPs were selected based on different criteria like genotype call rate, minor allele frequency, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium. A panel of 50 SNPs was sufficient to identify an individual uniquely: the probability of identity was 6.9 × 10
conclusionsThis first DNA/RNA SNP panel will be useful to identify sample mix-ups in biomedical research and for assigning DNA and RNA stains in crime scenes to unique individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.