ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018
Quasiharmonic Analysis of the Energy Landscapes of Dihydrofolate Reductase from Piezophiles and Mesophiles.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pressure Adaptations in Deep-SeaBiology · 2021Article
- Adaptations for Pressure and Temperature in Dihydrofolate Reductases.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Effects of Pressure and Temperature on the Atomic Fluctuations of Dihydrofolate Reductase from a Psychropiezophile and a Mesophile.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Adaptations for Pressure and Temperature Effects on Loop Motion inHigh pressure research · 2019Article
- Enzymes from piezophiles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A quasiharmonic analysis (QHA) method is used to compare the potential energy landscapes of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from a piezophile (pressure-loving organism), Moritella profunda (Mp), and a mesophile, Escherichia coli (Ec). The QHA method considers atomic fluctuations of the protein as motions of an atom in a local effective potential created by neighboring atoms and quantitates it in terms of effective force constants, isothermal compressibilities, and thermal expansivities. The analysis indicates that the underlying potential energy surface of MpDHFR is inherently softer than that of EcDHFR. In addition, on picosecond time scales, the energy surfaces become more similar under the growth conditions of Mp and Ec. On these time scales, DHFR behaves as expected; namely, increasing temperature makes the effective energy minimum less steep because thermal fluctuations increase the available volume, whereas increasing pressure steepens it because compression reduces the available volume. Our longer simulations show that, on nanosecond time scales, increasing temperature has a similar effect as on picosecond time scales because thermal fluctuations increase the volume even more on a longer time scale. However, these simulations also indicate that, on nanosecond time scales, pressure makes the local potential less steep, contrary to picosecond time scales. Further examination of the QHA indicates the nanosecond pressure response may originate at picosecond time scales at the exterior of the protein, which suggests that protein-water interactions may be involved. The results may lead to understanding adaptations in enzymes made by piezophiles that enable them to function at higher pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.