Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370377›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2018

Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential.

Harry Hemingway, Folkert W Asselbergs, John Danesh, Richard Dobson, Nikolaos Maniadakis, Aldo Maggioni, Ghislaine J M van Thiel, Maureen Cronin, Gunnar Brobert, Panos Vardas and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Physicians' perspectives on clinical indicators: systematic review and thematic synthesis.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Harry HemingwayResearch Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK.
Folkert W AsselbergsResearch Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK.
John DaneshMRC/BHF Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.
Richard DobsonResearch Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK.
Nikolaos ManiadakisEuropean Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035 Route des Colles, Les Templiers - CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
Aldo MaggioniEuropean Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035 Route des Colles, Les Templiers - CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
Ghislaine J M van ThielDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Maureen CroninVifor Pharma Ltd, lughofstrasse 61, 8152 Glattbrugg, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gunnar BrobertDepartment of Epidemiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Müllerstrasse 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Panos VardasEuropean Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035 Route des Colles, Les Templiers - CS 80179 Biot, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
Stefan D AnkerDivision of Cardiology and Metabolism-Heart Failure, Cachexia & Sarcopenia; Department of Cardiology (CVK), Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité University Medicine, Charitépl. 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Diederick E GrobbeeJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Spiros DenaxasResearch Department of Clinical Epidemiology, The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK.
Innovative Medicines Initiative 2nd programme, Big Data for Better Outcomes, BigData@Heart Consortium of 20 academic and industry partners including ESC

Funding

DYNAMICS OF TRANSITION TO VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATIONF32HL008014 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAXBERG, BO E · 1990 to 1990
–
British Heart Foundation RG/08/014/24067Department of Health CDF-2015-08-074Medical Research Council MC_PC_13041Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Cohorts of millions of people's health records, whole genome sequencing, imaging, sensor, societal and publicly available data present a rapidly expanding digital trace of health. We aimed to critically review, for the first time, the challenges and potential of big data across early and late stages of translational cardiovascular disease research. Methods and results: We sought exemplars based on literature reviews and expertise across the BigData@Heart Consortium. We identified formidable challenges including: data quality, knowing what data exist, the legal and ethical framework for their use, data sharing, building and maintaining public trust, developing standards for defining disease, developing tools for scalable, replicable science and equipping the clinical and scientific work force with new inter-disciplinary skills. Opportunities claimed for big health record data include: richer profiles of health and disease from birth to death and from the molecular to the societal scale; accelerated understanding of disease causation and progression, discovery of new mechanisms and treatment-relevant disease sub-phenotypes, understanding health and diseases in whole populations and whole health systems and returning actionable feedback loops to improve (and potentially disrupt) existing models of research and care, with greater efficiency. In early translational research we identified exemplars including: discovery of fundamental biological processes e.g. linking exome sequences to lifelong electronic health records (EHR) (e.g. human knockout experiments); drug development: genomic approaches to drug target validation; precision medicine: e.g. DNA integrated into hospital EHR for pre-emptive pharmacogenomics. In late translational research we identified exemplars including: learning health systems with outcome trials integrated into clinical care; citizen driven health with 24/7 multi-parameter patient monitoring to improve outcomes and population-based linkages of multiple EHR sources for higher resolution clinical epidemiology and public health. Conclusion: High volumes of inherently diverse ('big') EHR data are beginning to disrupt the nature of cardiovascular research and care. Such big data have the potential to improve our understanding of disease causation and classification relevant for early translation and to contribute actionable analytics to improve health and healthcare.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalBig DataCardiovascular DiseasesElectronic Health RecordsHumans

Identifiers

PMID29370377
PMCPMC6019015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.