Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

CLC-Pred: A freely available web-service for in silico prediction of human cell line cytotoxicity for drug-like compounds.

Alexey A Lagunin, Varvara I Dubovskaja, Anastasia V Rudik, Pavel V Pogodin, Dmitry S Druzhilovskiy, Tatyana A Gloriozova, Dmitry A Filimonov, Narahari G Sastry, Vladimir V Poroikov

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. QSAR Modeling for Predicting ICInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cytotoxic Effects ofACS omega · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular docking andToxicology reports · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexey A LaguninDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1757-8004
Varvara I DubovskajaDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia V RudikDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Pavel V PogodinDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry S DruzhilovskiyDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana A GloriozovaDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry A FilimonovDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Narahari G SastryCentre for Molecular Modeling, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad, India.
Vladimir V PoroikovDepartment for Bioinformatics, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico methods of phenotypic screening are necessary to reduce the time and cost of the experimental in vivo screening of anticancer agents through dozens of millions of natural and synthetic chemical compounds. We used the previously developed PASS (Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances) algorithm to create and validate the classification SAR models for predicting the cytotoxicity of chemicals against different types of human cell lines using ChEMBL experimental data. A training set from 59,882 structures of compounds was created based on the experimental data (IG50, IC50, and % inhibition values) from ChEMBL. The average accuracy of prediction (AUC) calculated by leave-one-out and a 20-fold cross-validation procedure during the training was 0.930 and 0.927 for 278 cancer cell lines, respectively, and 0.948 and 0.947 for cytotoxicity prediction for 27 normal cell lines, respectively. Using the given SAR models, we developed a freely available web-service for cell-line cytotoxicity profile prediction (CLC-Pred: Cell-Line Cytotoxicity Predictor) based on the following structural formula: http://way2drug.com/Cell-line/.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationInternetAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell LineCell Line, TumorDrug RepositioningDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleHumansStructure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID29370280
PMCPMC5784992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.