Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370205›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Sex differences in obesity related cancer incidence in relation to type 2 diabetes diagnosis (ZODIAC-49).

Dennis Schrijnders, Steven H Hendriks, Nanne Kleefstra, Pauline A J Vissers, Jeffrey A Johnson, Geertruida H de Bock, Henk J G Bilo, Gijs W D Landman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis SchrijndersLangerhans Medical Research Group, Zwolle, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-6989
Steven H HendriksDiabetes Centre, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Nanne KleefstraLangerhans Medical Research Group, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Pauline A J VissersNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jeffrey A JohnsonSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-2857
Geertruida H de BockUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Henk J G BiloDiabetes Centre, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Gijs W D LandmanLangerhans Medical Research Group, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLGelre Hospitals · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes and obesity seem to be partly overlapping risk factors for the development of obesity-related cancer (mainly breast, prostate and colorectal cancer) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In the general population, women have a lower risk for obesity-related cancer compared to men. Previous studies involving cardiovascular disease have shown that T2DM eliminates a female advantage of lower CVD risk in the general population compared to men. It is unclear whether the same could be true for obesity-related cancer. This study aimed to this investigate obesity-related cancer incidence in women and men known with T2DM as compared to the Dutch general population.

methodsThis study included 69,583 patients with T2DM selected from a prospective primary care cohort, which was linked to the Dutch National Cancer Registry to obtain cancer specific data. Obesity-related cancers included liver, kidney, colorectal, gallbladder, pancreas, ovarian, endometrial, advanced prostate cancer, post-menopausal breast cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Primary outcome was sex-stratified, age and year of cancer diagnosis adjusted standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for three time periods: 5 years before, the year after diagnosis and the next 4 years after T2DM diagnosis. The Dutch general population was used as reference group.

resultsWomen with T2DM were at an increased risk for obesity-related cancer compared to women in the general population already 5 years before diabetes diagnosis (SIR 1.77; 95%CI: 1.63-1.91). In both men and women, there was a peak in obesity-related cancer incidence following diabetes diagnosis (SIR: 1.38; 95%CI 1.11-1.64 and SIR: 2.21; 95%CI 1.94-2.30, respectively). From the second to the fifth year after diabetes diagnosis the obesity-related cancer incidence was higher in women compared to women in the general population (SIR: 2.12; 95%CI 1.94-2.30).

conclusionsWomen with T2DM seem to have a substantially higher obesity-related cancer risk. As opposed to men, in women this risk was already increased years before diabetes diagnosis. These results could imply that a relative advantage of women in the general population with regard to cancer risk is lost in women with T2DM.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsObesityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29370205
PMCPMC5784905
OpenAlexW2788724508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.