Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370157›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2018

Mass cytometry analysis of immune cells in the brain.

Ben Korin, Tania Dubovik, Asya Rolls

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microglia in Glioma.Advances in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Chronic infection by atypicalBrain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2023
    Article
  16. Effects of 3-HAA on HCC by Regulating the Heterogeneous Macrophages-A scRNA-Seq Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neuronal-Immune Cell Units in Allergic Inflammation in the Nose.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ben KorinDepartment of Immunology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Tania DubovikDepartment of Immunology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Asya RollsDepartment of Immunology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5862-4287
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune cells comprise a diverse and dynamic cell population that is responsible for a broad range of immunological activities. They act in concert with other immune and nonimmune cells via cytokine-mediated communication and direct cell-cell interactions. Understanding the complex immune network requires a broad characterization of its individual cellular components. This is especially relevant for the brain compartment, which is an active immunological site, composed of resident and infiltrating immune cells that affect brain development, tissue homeostasis and neuronal activity. Mass cytometry, or CyTOF (cytometry by time-of-flight), uses metal-conjugated antibodies to enable a high-dimensional description of tens of markers at the single-cell level, thereby providing a bird's-eye view of the immune system. This technique has been successfully applied to the discovery of novel immune populations in humans and rodents. Here, we provide a step-by-step description of a mass cytometry approach for the analysis of the mouse brain compartment. The different stages of the procedure include brain perfusion, extraction of the brain tissue and its dissociation into a single-cell suspension, followed by cell staining with metal-tagged antibodies, sample reading using a mass cytometer, and data analysis using SPADE and viSNE. This procedure takes <5 h (excluding data analysis) and can be applied to study modifications in the brain's immune populations under normal and pathological conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBrainFlow CytometryHumansImage CytometryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuroimagingSingle-Cell AnalysisStaining and LabelingBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29370157
OpenAlexW2784653024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.