Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29370024›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2018

Assessing the True Intraocular Pressure in the Non-human Primate.

Faith McAllister, Ronald Harwerth, Nimesh Patel

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faith McAllisterUniversity of Houston, College of Optometry, Houston, Texas *npatel@central.uh.edu.
Ronald Harwerth
Nimesh Patel
University of Houston · US

Funding

Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI GEUNYOUNG YOON · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Behavioral Measures of VisionR01EY001139 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI HARWERTH, RONALD S · 1985 to 2016
$5.2M
SHORT TERM TRAINING--STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONST35EY007088 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FRISHMAN, LAURA J. · 1985 to 2025
$2.3M
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Area in Aging and GlaucomaK23EY021761 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI PATEL, NIMESH BHIKHU · 2011 to 2015
$1.0M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY021761NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS R01 EY001139NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceFor glaucoma patients, high intraocular pressure (IOP) is a risk factor for progressive neuropathy. Similarly, animal models used to study the disease are based on an experimental elevation of IOP. Thus, accurate IOP measurements are important in characterizing experimental models and resulting effects. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate IOP measurements in a non-human primate model of experimental glaucoma by comparing clinical tonometry (Tono-Pen and TonoVet) to the true IOP from intracameral manometry.

methodsA total of 17 rhesus macaque eyes from 12 animals were used for this study. Eleven eyes had no previous experimental intervention, whereas six eyes were at varying stages of laser-induced experimental glaucoma. IOPs were adjusted by inserting a needle in the anterior chamber that was attached to a pressure transducer and syringe pump system. The anterior chamber IOP was adjusted to values between 10 and 50 mmHg and corresponding measures with Tono-Pen and TonoVet were taken.

resultsThe IOPs by TonoVet and Tono-Pen were linearly related over the range of pressures tested (slope = 0.68 normal/healthy and 0.72 experimental glaucoma). For the most, TonoVet measures overestimated IOP at all anterior chamber pressure settings (mean difference of 3.17 mmHg, 95% CI 12.53 to -4.74 normal and 3.90 mmHg, 95% CI 12.90 to -6.53 experimental glaucoma). In contrast, Tono-Pen measures overestimated IOP at lower IOPs and underestimated at higher IOP (slope = -0.26 normal and -0.21 experimental glaucoma).

conclusionsThe TonoVet and Tono-Pen tonometers that are often used to assess IOP in both clinical and experimental settings generally reflect the status of IOP, but the results from this study suggest that the instruments need calibration with true anterior chamber pressure for accurate measures in experimental models of glaucoma.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsBiometryFemaleGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMacaca mulattaMaleOcular HypertensionReproducibility of ResultsTonometry, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID29370024
PMCPMC5796835
OpenAlexW2793943562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.