ReviewOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2018
The Role of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Devices in the Management of Glaucoma.
Review in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of a Novel 360° Canaloplasty Device in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- One-Year Real-World Outcomes of Ab-Externo Gel Stent Placement From the EXPAND Study.Journal of glaucoma · 2025Article
- Review
- Neuroprotective effects of resveratrol on retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma in rodents: A narrative review.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical outcomes of canaloplasty via an ab-interno surgical technique using the iTrack device: a narrative review.International ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Magnetically actuated glaucoma drainage device for regulating intraocular pressure after implantation.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Article
- Preventing Blindness with Early Cataract Surgery and Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery in Patients Over 50: Guidance for Patients, Physicians and World Governments in Dealing with Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Reasons for choice of glaucoma surgery in eyes not treated with anti-glaucoma medications.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- A Multicenter 12-Month Retrospective Evaluation of Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma: The ROMEO 2 Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.Eye (London, England) · 2021Review
- Trends in Surgical Glaucoma Treatment in Germany Between 2006 and 2018.Clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- XEN gel implant with or without phacoemulsification for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- The future of canine glaucoma therapy.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2019Review
- Miniaturization in Glaucoma Monitoring and Treatment: A Review of New Technologies That Require a Minimal Surgical Approach.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2019Review
- Impact of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery on the ocular surface and quality of life in patients with glaucoma.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
- The Use of Fixation Suture to Treat Inferonasal Hypertrophic Bleb after Xen Gel Stent Implant: A Case Report.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
- Development and material characteristics of glaucoma surgical implants.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2018
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceNoncompliance is a problem affecting glaucoma patients. Approaches to improve adherence include the use of drug-delivery systems and safer forms of surgery. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has reduced complications, particularly in combination with cataract surgery, and with its good intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction may reduce or eliminate glaucoma medications.Glaucoma is a progressive disease and a leading cause of irreversible blindness. Elevated IOP is the most important risk factor, but effective medical management is dependent on patient adherence. This review summarizes the adherence problem in glaucoma and the efforts, including MIGS, to provide effective IOP control that is not dependent on patient compliance.The current understanding of patient adherence to pharmacological treatment of glaucoma is discussed including the challenges facing glaucoma patients. Historical approaches to providing IOP control in a sustained and reliable way are presented culminating in a review of the burgeoning use of MIGS devices.It is estimated that, in the United States, 27% of prescriptions written, across all medications, are not filled or are filled but not taken. For ocular hypotensive medications, even when filled, a large percentage (which varies widely by study) are not instilled as prescribed. To address this problem, methods for sustained drug delivery have been and continue to be developed, as well as surgical and laser approaches. Most recently, MIGS devices have gained popularity because of the ease of implantation during cataract surgery, favorable safety profile, and the possibility for effective and long-lasting IOP lowering, as well as the reduction or elimination of need for IOP-lowering medication.Poor adherence to treatment is relatively common among glaucoma patients and is associated with progression of disease. Recommending MIGS implantation during cataract surgery may offer optometrists a valuable treatment option in managing glaucoma patients, particularly where good adherence is in doubt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.