Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29369676›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2018

Lifetime trauma, perceived control, and all-cause mortality: Results from the Midlife in the United States Study.

Ari J Elliot, Nicholas A Turiano, Frank J Infurna, Margie E Lachman, Benjamin P Chapman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Lifetime trauma exposure and accelerated epigenetic aging among midlife women.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The psychosocial dimension of housing in Nunavik: does social support vary with household crowding?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Family versus intimate partners: Estimating who matters more for health in a 20-year longitudinal study.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2020
    Article
  14. Resilience and immunity.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ari J ElliotDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center.
Nicholas A TurianoDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University.ORCID 0000-0002-2266-2959
Frank J InfurnaDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University.
Margie E LachmanDepartment of Psychology, Brandeis University.
Benjamin P ChapmanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0002-5170-3131

Funding

U19 MIDlife in the United States-Diversity Supplement-WellsU19AG051426 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHRISTOPHER L COE · 2016 to 2026
$74.8M
STATISTICS COREP01AG020166 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RYFF, CAROL D. · 2002 to 2015
$50.6M
WV Prevention Research CenterU48DP005004 · DP · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DINO, GERI A · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
Personality-Epidemiologic Research on Inequalities in LongevityR01AG042582 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CHAPMAN, BENJAMIN P · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005004NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020166NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042582NIA NIH HHS U19 AG051426United States Department Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; National Institute on Aging
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether lifetime-trauma exposure predicts all-cause mortality and whether this association is mediated or moderated by perceived control.

methodA sample of middle-aged and older adults (N = 4,961) who participated in the second wave of the Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS) provided data. Lifetime trauma was operationalized using the reported number of potentially traumatic experiences spanning childhood through adulthood. Both the perceived constraints and mastery dimensions of perceived control were examined. Cox regression models tested main effects and interactions of lifetime trauma with mastery and constraints predicting 10-year mortality risk.

resultsThere was a significant main effect of lifetime trauma, b = .06, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07, p = .032, and an interaction of trauma with mastery, b = -.08, p = .004. A greater number of traumatic experiences was associated with increased mortality risk at below-average levels of mastery, -1 SD; HR = 1.14, p < .001, but not at above-average levels, +1 SD; HR = 0.97, p = .48. This interaction persisted after further adjustment for health status, psychological, and behavioral covariates. An association of constraints with elevated mortality risk, HR = 1.33, p = .008, was attenuated in a fully adjusted model, HR = 1.06, p = .26.

conclusionA strong sense of mastery may buffer elevated mortality risk associated with exposure to traumatic experiences. Findings extend evidence that mastery may foster resilience to the adverse health effects of traumatic stressors, whereas constraints may show stronger independent associations with health outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityUnited StatesWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID29369676
PMCPMC6057153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.