Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29369665›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2018

Distress intolerance modulation of neurophysiological markers of cognitive control during a complex go/no-go task.

Richard J Macatee, Brian J Albanese, Kevin Clancy, Nicholas P Allan, Edward M Bernat, Jesse R Cougle, Norman B Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of a computerized distress intolerance intervention on electrocortical reactivity to cannabis and threat cues: A randomized controlled trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Distress intolerance moderation of neurophysiological markers of response inhibition after induced stress: Relations with cannabis use disorder.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard J MacateeDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Brian J AlbaneseDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Kevin ClancyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Nicholas P AllanDepartment of Psychology, Ohio University.
Edward M BernatDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park.
Jesse R CougleDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Norman B SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.

Funding

Chemosensory Training Program (CTP)T32DC000044 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEBRA Ann FADOOL · 1995 to 2026
$5.3M
Integrated Clinical Neuroscience Training for Translational ResearchT32MH093311 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA A ECKEL, Pamela K. Keel · 2012 to 2026
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000044NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distress intolerance (DI), a trait-like individual difference reflective of the inability to endure aversive affective states, is relevant to multiple forms of psychopathology, but its relations to theoretically relevant neurobiological systems have received little attention. Altered cognitive control-related neurobiology has been theorized to underlie individual differences in DI, but little empirical work has been conducted. To test this hypothesis, baseline data from a large community sample with elevated high levels of emotional psychopathology and comorbidity was utilized (N = 256). Participants completed a complex go/no-go task while EEG was recorded, and P2, N2, and P3 amplitudes were measured. Based upon prior findings on the relations between these components and response inhibition, a core cognitive control function, we hypothesized that DI would predict reduced no-go N2 and P3 amplitude while controlling for current anxious/depressive symptom severity (i.e., negative affect). Peak amplitudes from the raw data and principal components analysis were used to quantify amplitude of ERP components. Partially consistent with predictions, high DI was independently associated with reduced no-go N2 peak amplitude in the raw ERP data, and was significantly related to a frontal positivity factor in the N2 time window across no-go and go trials. Contrary to predictions, no relations between DI and the P3 were found. Overall, results support the theorized relevance of cognitive control-linked neurobiology to individual differences in tolerance of distress over and above distress severity itself, and suggest specific relations between DI and alterations in early controlled attention/conflict-monitoring but not response inhibition or response inhibition-related sequelae. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Executive FunctionPersonalityPsychomotor PerformanceStress, PsychologicalAdultBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansIndividualityInhibition, PsychologicalMaleNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID29369665
PMCPMC5858937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.