ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2018
Distress intolerance modulation of neurophysiological markers of cognitive control during a complex go/no-go task.
Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a brief distress intolerance intervention on acute stress modulation of response inhibition neurophysiology in cannabis use disorder.Addictive behaviors · 2023Trial
- Impact of a computerized distress intolerance intervention on electrocortical reactivity to cannabis and threat cues: A randomized controlled trial.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022Trial
- Cognitive control training for urgency: A pilot randomized controlled trial in an acute clinical sample.Behaviour research and therapy · 2021Trial
- Impact of a computerized intervention for high distress intolerance on cannabis use outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2021Trial
- Distress Intolerance Is Associated With a Greater Reward Positivity to Aversive Avoidance Feedback.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Testing Judicious Use of Safety Behaviors During Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining When and For Whom Safety Behaviors Improve Fear Reduction.Cognitive therapy and research · 2025Article
- Cognitive control: modeling the impact on mental health.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- An Integrative Model of Youth Anxiety: Cognitive-Affective Processes and Parenting in Developmental Context.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023Article
- Who disengages from emotion and when? An EMA study of how urgency and distress intolerance relate to daily emotion regulation.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Attentional Control Moderates the Relations between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Symptoms.Cognitive therapy and research · 2021Article
- Linking RDoC and HiTOP: A new interface for advancing psychiatric nosology and neuroscience.Clinical psychology review · 2021Review
- Distress intolerance moderation of motivated attention to cannabis and negative stimuli after induced stress among cannabis users: an ERP study.Addiction biology · 2019Article
- Distress intolerance moderation of neurophysiological markers of response inhibition after induced stress: Relations with cannabis use disorder.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018Article
- Article
- The Role of Cognitive Control in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study Based on Performance in Go/No-go Task.Basic and clinical neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distress intolerance (DI), a trait-like individual difference reflective of the inability to endure aversive affective states, is relevant to multiple forms of psychopathology, but its relations to theoretically relevant neurobiological systems have received little attention. Altered cognitive control-related neurobiology has been theorized to underlie individual differences in DI, but little empirical work has been conducted. To test this hypothesis, baseline data from a large community sample with elevated high levels of emotional psychopathology and comorbidity was utilized (N = 256). Participants completed a complex go/no-go task while EEG was recorded, and P2, N2, and P3 amplitudes were measured. Based upon prior findings on the relations between these components and response inhibition, a core cognitive control function, we hypothesized that DI would predict reduced no-go N2 and P3 amplitude while controlling for current anxious/depressive symptom severity (i.e., negative affect). Peak amplitudes from the raw data and principal components analysis were used to quantify amplitude of ERP components. Partially consistent with predictions, high DI was independently associated with reduced no-go N2 peak amplitude in the raw ERP data, and was significantly related to a frontal positivity factor in the N2 time window across no-go and go trials. Contrary to predictions, no relations between DI and the P3 were found. Overall, results support the theorized relevance of cognitive control-linked neurobiology to individual differences in tolerance of distress over and above distress severity itself, and suggest specific relations between DI and alterations in early controlled attention/conflict-monitoring but not response inhibition or response inhibition-related sequelae. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.