Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29369197›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Different surgical approaches in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and their influence on metabolic syndrome: A retrospective study.

Hady Razak Hady, Magdalena Olszewska, Mikolaj Czerniawski, Dawid Groth, Inna Diemieszczyk, Patrycja Pawluszewicz, Adam Kretowski, Jerzy Robert Ladny, Jacek Dadan

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. BARIATRIC SURGERY IMPACT ON GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX AND DENTAL WEAR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. DENTAL WEAR AND TOOTH LOSS IN MORBID OBESE PATIENTS AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2019
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hady Razak Hady1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
Magdalena Olszewska1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
Mikolaj Czerniawski1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
Dawid Groth1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
Inna Diemieszczyk1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
Patrycja Pawluszewicz1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
Adam KretowskiDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine.
Jerzy Robert LadnyDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Disasters, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Podlaskie, Poland.
Jacek Dadan1st Department of General and Endocrinological Surgery.
General Department of Preventive Medicine · VNMedical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a growing health, social, and economic issue and became an epidemic, according to recent report of World Health Organization.The only method with scientifically proved efficiency of body mass loss is a surgical treatment. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is recently a leading method in metabolic surgery. There are no standards of operative technique for LSG so far. The influence of technique modification on metabolic effect has not been described clearly.The aim of this study was to evaluate metabolic effects in patients with morbid obesity who underwent various surgical approaches of LSG.The study included 120 patients who were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group I, where bougie size was 32 French (Fr), Group II-36 Fr and Group III-40 Fr. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups, based on the distance of resection beginning from the pylorus-2 or 6 cm. Statistical analysis of: body mass index (BMI), the Percentage of Excess Weight Loss (%EWL), the Percentage of Excess BMI Loss (%EBMIL), levels of glucose and insulin on an empty stomach, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin resistance (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance Index-HOMA-IR), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TG), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were under investigation.Statistically significant decrease in body mass, BMI, %EWL, %EBL, glucose, and insulin concentrations has been observed in all studied groups. It was the highest when the smallest calibration tube has been used (32 Fr). Similar results were observed in HOMA-IR and HbA1c levels. Statistically significant decrease of total cholesterol, LDL, and TG concentrations have been observed. Significant increase of HDL in every group has been also noted. Postoperative CRP values were the lowest when the smallest bougie was used.LSG is effective method of obesity treatment. Metabolic effects of LSG are the most noticeable when a small bougie size is used.

Indexed as

AdultAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBody WeightCholesterolC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGastrectomyGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceLaparoscopyMaleAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBlood GlucoseCholesterolC-Reactive ProteinGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanInsulin

Identifiers

PMID29369197
PMCPMC5794381
OpenAlexW2792560902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.