Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29369177›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Functional performance comparison between real and virtual tasks in older adults: A cross-sectional study.

Ítalla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra, Tânia Brusque Crocetta, Thais Massetti, Talita Dias da Silva, Regiani Guarnieri, Cassio de Miranda Meira, Claudia Arab, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Luciano Vieira de Araujo, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sequential motor learning transfers from real to virtual environment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ítalla Maria Pinheiro BezerraSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities of the University of São Paulo -EACH-USP, São Paulo, SP.
Tânia Brusque CrocettaLaboratory of Design of Studies and Scientific Writing, ABC School of Medicine, Santo Andre, SP.
Thais MassettiDepartment of Speech Therapy, Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo.
Talita Dias da SilvaSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities of the University of São Paulo -EACH-USP, São Paulo, SP.
Regiani GuarnieriLaboratory of Design of Studies and Scientific Writing, ABC School of Medicine, Santo Andre, SP.
Cassio de Miranda MeiraSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities of the University of São Paulo -EACH-USP, São Paulo, SP.
Claudia ArabPaulista School of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Federal University of Sao Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Carlos de AbreuPostgraduate Program in Public Policies and Local Development, School of Sciences of Santa Casa de Misericordia de Vitoria, Vitoria, ES.
Luciano Vieira de AraujoSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities of the University of São Paulo -EACH-USP, São Paulo, SP.
Carlos Bandeira de Mello MonteiroSchool of Arts, Sciences and Humanities of the University of São Paulo -EACH-USP, São Paulo, SP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAgeing is usually accompanied by deterioration of physical abilities, such as muscular strength, sensory sensitivity, and functional capacity, making chronic diseases, and the well-being of older adults new challenges to global public health.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a task practiced in a virtual environment could promote better performance and enable transfer to the same task in a real environment.

methodThe study evaluated 65 older adults of both genders, aged 60 to 82 years (M = 69.6, SD = 6.3). A timing coincident task was applied to measure the perceptual-motor ability to perform a motor response. The participants were divided into 2 groups: started in a real interface and started in a virtual interface.

resultsAll subjects improved their performance during the practice, but improvement was not observed for the real interface, as the participants were near maximum performance from the beginning of the task. However, there was no transfer of performance from the virtual to real environment or vice versa.

conclusionsThe virtual environment was shown to provide improvement of performance with a short-term motor learning protocol in a timing coincident task. This result suggests that the practice of tasks in a virtual environment seems to be a promising tool for the assessment and training of healthy older adults, even though there was no transfer of performance to a real environment.

trial registrationISRCTN02960165. Registered 8 November 2016.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsTask Performance and AnalysisVirtual RealityAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29369177
PMCPMC5794361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.