Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368789›Full record

ReviewObstetrical & gynecological survey2018

Techniques for Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.

Melanie R Meister, Joshua I Rosenbloom, Jerry L Lowder, Alison G Cahill

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rectovaginal Fistulas Secondary to Obstetrical Injury.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021
    Review
  11. [Surgical reconstruction of traumatic sphincter muscle defects].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie R MeisterClinical Fellow, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery.
Joshua I RosenbloomClinical Fellow, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
Jerry L LowderAssociate Professor, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery.
Alison G CahillAssociate Professor, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Optimizing Management of the Second Stage of Labor: Multicenter Randomized TrialU01HD077384 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAHILL, ALISON G, TUULI, METHODIUS GAMUO · 2014 to 2019
$7.8M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD077384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASISs) complicate up to 11% of vaginal deliveries; obstetricians must be able to recognize and manage these technically challenging injuries.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to share our approach for management of these challenging complications of childbirth based on a multidisciplinary collaboration between general obstetrician-gynecologists, maternal fetal medicine specialists, and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons established at our institution. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed in 3 search engines: PubMed 1946-, EMBASE 1947-, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using keywords

resultsIdentification should begin with an assessment of risk factors, notably nulliparity and operative vaginal delivery, consistently associated with the highest risk of OASISs, and proceed with a thorough examination to grade the degree of laceration. Repair should be performed or supervised by an experienced clinician in an operating room with either regional or general anesthesia. The external anal sphincter may be repaired using either an overlapping or end-to-end anastomosis. Providers should be comfortable with both approaches as the degree of laceration may necessitate one approach over the other. We advocate for use of monofilament suture on all layers to decrease risk of bacterial seeding, as well as preoperative antibiotics and postoperative bowel regimen, which are associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Long-term sequelae, including pain, dyspareunia, and fecal incontinence, significantly impact quality of life for many patients who suffer OASISs and may be avoided if evidence-based guidelines for recognition and repair are utilized.

Indexed as

Suture TechniquesAnal CanalAnti-Bacterial AgentsDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPerineumPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyRisk FactorsVaginaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29368789
PMCPMC5788295
OpenAlexW2784237699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.