Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368635›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2018

Cerebral metabolic effects of strict versus conventional glycaemic targets following severe traumatic brain injury.

Mark P Plummer, Natalia Notkina, Ivan Timofeev, Peter J Hutchinson, Mark E Finnis, Arun K Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. High-physiological and supra-physiological 1,2-Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark P PlummerNeurosciences Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Natalia NotkinaDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Ivan TimofeevDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Peter J HutchinsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Mark E FinnisIntensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Arun K GuptaNeurosciences Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. akg01@icloud.com.
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

Department of Health 12/35/57Department of Health HTA/13/15/02Department of Health II-C5-0715-20005Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0502030Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G0601025Medical Research Council G1002277Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal glycaemic targets for patients with severe traumatic brain injury remain unclear. The primary objective of this microdialysis study was to compare cerebral metabolism with strict versus conventional glycaemic control.

methodsWe performed a prospective single-centre randomised controlled within-subject crossover study of 20 adult patients admitted to an academic neurointensive care unit with severe traumatic brain injury. Patients underwent randomised, consecutive 24-h periods of strict (4-7 mmol/L; 72-126 mg/dl) and conventional (<10 mmol/L; 180 mg/dl) glycaemic control with microdialysis measurements performed hourly. The first 12 h of each study period was designated as a 'washout' period, with the subsequent 12 h being the period of interest.

resultsCerebral glucose was lower during strict glycaemia than with conventional control (mean 1.05 [95% CI 0.58-1.51] mmol/L versus 1.28 [0.81-1.74] mmol/L; P = 0.03), as was lactate (3.07 [2.44-3.70] versus 3.56 [2.81-4.30]; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in pyruvate or the lactate/pyruvate ratio between treatment phases. Strict glycaemia increased the frequency of low cerebral glucose (< 0.8 mmol/L; OR 1.91 [95% CI 1.01-3.65]; P < 0.05); however, there were no differences in the frequency of critically low glucose (< 0.2 mmol/L) or critically elevated lactate/pyruvate ratio between phases.

conclusionsCompared with conventional glycaemic targets, strict blood glucose control was associated with lower mean levels of cerebral glucose and an increased frequency of abnormally low glucose levels. These data support conventional glycaemic targets following traumatic brain injury.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN19146279 . Retrospectively registered on 2 May 2014.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultArterial PressureBlood GlucoseBrain Injuries, TraumaticCerebrumCross-Over StudiesFemaleGlycemic IndexHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinGlucoseInsulinMicrodialysisTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID29368635
PMCPMC5784688
OpenAlexW2784662789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.