Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368620›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2018

Molecular profiling of lung cancer specimens and liquid biopsies using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Eleonora Bonaparte, Chiara Pesenti, Laura Fontana, Rossella Falcone, Leda Paganini, Anna Marzorati, Stefano Ferrero, Mario Nosotti, Paolo Mendogni, Claudia Bareggi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Non-small cell lung cancer in China.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. MALDI-MS: Emerging roles in pathology and laboratory medicine.Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eleonora BonaparteDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Chiara PesentiDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Laura FontanaDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Rossella FalconeDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Leda PaganiniDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Anna MarzoratiDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Stefano FerreroDivision of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Mario NosottiDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Paolo MendogniThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Claudia BareggiOncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Silvia Maria SirchiaMedical Genetics, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Antonio di Rudini, 8 -20142, Milan, Italy.
Silvia TabanoDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy. silvia.tabano@unimi.it.
Silvano BosariDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.
Monica MiozzoDepartment of Pathophysiology & Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza, 35 -20122, Milan, Italy.

Funding

IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy Progetto a concorso 2014-2015Ministero della Salute - Regione Lombardia (Ricerca Finalizzata 2011-2012) RF-2011-02347106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of predictive molecular alterations in lung adenocarcinoma is essential for accurate therapeutic decisions. Although several molecular approaches are available, a number of issues, including tumor heterogeneity, frequent material scarcity, and the large number of loci to be investigated, must be taken into account in selecting the most appropriate technique. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS), which allows multiplexed genotyping, has been adopted in routine diagnostics as a sensitive, reliable, fast, and cost-effective method. Our aim was to test the reliability of this approach in detecting targetable mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, we also analyzed low-quality samples, such as cytologic specimens, that often, are the unique source of starting material in lung cancer cases, to test the sensitivity of the system.

methodsWe designed a MS-based assay for testing 158 mutations in the EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ALK, PIK3CA, ERBB2, DDR2, AKT, and MEK1 genes and applied it to 92 NSCLC specimens and 13 liquid biopsies from another subset of NSCLC patients. We also tested the sensitivity of the method to distinguish low represented mutations using serial dilutions of mutated DNA.

resultsOur panel is able to detect the most common NSCLC mutations and the frequency of the mutations observed in our cohort was comparable to literature data. The assay identifies mutated alleles at frequencies of 2.5-10%. In addition, we found that the amount of DNA template was irrelevant to efficiently uncover mutated alleles present at high frequency. However, when using less than 10 ng of DNA, the assay can detect mutations present in at least 10% of the alleles. Finally, using MS and a commercial kit for RT-PCR we tested liquid biopsy from 13 patients with identified mutations in cancers and detected the mutations in 4 (MS) and in 5 samples (RT-PCR).

conclusionsMS is a powerful method for the routine predictive tests of lung cancer also using low quality and scant tissues. Finally, after appropriate validation and improvement, MS could represent a promising and cost-effective strategy for monitoring the presence and percentage of the mutations also in non-invasive sampling.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansLung NeoplasmsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationBiomarkers, TumorMALDI-TOF mass spectrometryMolecular diagnosticsNon-small cell lung cancerTargeted therapyTumor genotyping

Identifiers

PMID29368620
PMCPMC6389067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.