Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368604›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2018

Long-acting bronchodilators improve exercise capacity in COPD patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fabiano Di Marco, Giovanni Sotgiu, Pierachille Santus, Denis E O'Donnell, Kai-Michael Beeh, Simone Dore, Maria Adelaide Roggi, Lisa Giuliani, Francesco Blasi, Stefano Centanni

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical interventions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fabiano Di MarcoRespiratory Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Department of Health Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via A. di Rudinì, 8-20142, Milan, Italy. fabiano.dimarco@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1743-0504
Giovanni SotgiuClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Pierachille SantusDepartment of Biomedical And Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Denis E O'DonnellDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Investigation Unit, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Kai-Michael BeehInsaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Simone DoreClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Maria Adelaide RoggiCardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Lisa GiulianiRespiratory Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Department of Health Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via A. di Rudinì, 8-20142, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BlasiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefano CentanniRespiratory Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Department of Health Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via A. di Rudinì, 8-20142, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate the efficacy of longacting bronchodilators on exercise capacity in COPD patients. Methods: The endpoints were the efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators (altogether, and by single classes) vs. placebo in modifying endurance time (ET), inspiratory capacity (IC) and dyspnea during exercise, taking into consideration the outcomes according to different patients’ inclusion criteria and exercise methodology. Results: Twenty-two studies were deemed eligible for analysis. Weighted mean increase in ET resulted of 67 s (95% CI ranges from 55 to 79). For isotime IC and dyspnea during exercise, weighted improvements were 195 ml (162–229), and − 0.41 units (− 0.56 to − 0.27), respectively. The increase in trough IC was 157 ml (138–175). We found a trend in favour of LAMA compared to LABA in terms of ET. In the 11 studies which reported a value of functional residual capacity > 120% as inclusion criterion, weighted mean increase in endurance time was 94 s (65 to 123); however we did not find any significant correlation between ET and mean trough IC (P: 0.593). The improvement of ET in the 5 studies using walking as exercise methodology resulted of 58 s (− 4 to 121). Conclusions: Long-acting bronchodilators improve exercise capacity in COPD. The main effect of long-acting bronchodilators seems to be a increase of basal IC rather than a modification of dynamic hyperinflation during exercise. The efficacy in terms of endurance time seems higher in studies which enrolled patients with hyperinflation, with a similar efficacy on walking or cycling.

Indexed as

Bronchodilator AgentsCross-Over StudiesExerciseExercise ToleranceForced Expiratory VolumeHumansInspiratory CapacityPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBronchodilator AgentsBronchodilatorCOPDExercise

Identifiers

PMID29368604
PMCPMC5784692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.