Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368585›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is useful and well accepted as part of the clinical assessment for depression and anxiety in primary care: a mixed-methods study.

Agneta Pettersson, Sonja Modin, Rolf Wahlström, Sandra Af Winklerfelt Hammarberg, Ingvar Krakau

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06027281 (Psychiatric, Social and Sexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Married Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06027281 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Psychiatric, Social and Sexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Married Women

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsFemale Genital MutilationArmsHamilton depression rating scale (HDRS), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HARS), Mini international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI), Minnesota Multiphasic personality Inventory (MMPI), The Symptom Check-List-90-R (SCL-90-R)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agneta PetterssonMedical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. agneta.pettersson@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-3069
Sonja ModinDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23 D2, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Rolf WahlströmDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sandra Af Winklerfelt HammarbergDepartment for Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23 D2, SE 141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Ingvar KrakauDepartment of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit T2, 14, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric complaints are common among primary care patients, with depression and anxiety being the most frequent. Diagnosis of anxiety and depression can be difficult, potentially leading to over- as well as under-diagnosis. The diagnostic process can be facilitated by incorporating structured interviews as part of the assessment. One such instrument, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), has been established and accepted in psychiatric care. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of the paper-and-pen version of MINI version 6.0 among patients and staff in primary care centers in Sweden.

methodsThe MINI was introduced at three primary care centers and was conducted by either therapists or general practitioners. Patients presented with symptoms that could suggest depression or anxiety disorders. The duration of the interview was recorded. The experiences and perceptions of 125 patients and their interviewers were collected using a structured questionnaire. Global satisfaction was measured with a visual-analog scale (0-100). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 patients and three therapists, and focus groups were held with 17 general practitioners. Qualitative content analysis was used for the interviews and focus groups. The findings across the groups were triangulated with results from the questionnaires.

resultsThe median global satisfaction with the MINI was 80 for patients and 86 for interviewers. General practitioners appreciated that the MINI identified comorbidities, as one-third of the patients had at least two psychiatric diagnoses. The MINI helped general practitioners attain a more accurate diagnosis. Patients appreciated that the MINI helped them recognize and verbalize their problems and did not find it intrusive. Patients and interviewers had mixed experiences with the yes-no format of the MINI, and the risk of subjective interpretations was acknowledged. Patients, general practitioners and therapists stated that the MINI contributed to appropriate treatment. The MINI assessment lasted 26 min on average (range 12 to 60 min).

conclusionsThe paper-and-pen version of the MINI could be useful in primary care as part of the clinical assessment of patients with problems suggestive of depression or anxiety disorders. The MINI was well accepted by patients, general practitioners and therapists.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient SatisfactionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderGeneral PractitionersHumansProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychotherapySurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenAcceptabilityAnxietyDepressionDifferential diagnosisMINIQualitative content analysis

Identifiers

PMID29368585
PMCPMC5781342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.