Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368445›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2018

Lactobacillus reuteri strains protect epithelial barrier integrity of IPEC-J2 monolayers from the detrimental effect of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Shokoufeh Karimi, Hans Jonsson, Torbjörn Lundh, Stefan Roos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Role of ProbioticsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The role of potential probiotic strainsFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shokoufeh KarimiDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-7582
Hans JonssonDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0589-4886
Torbjörn LundhDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-3263
Stefan RoosDepartment of Molecular Sciences, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1606-1794
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacillus reuteri is an inhabitant of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of mammals and birds and several strains of this species are known to be effective probiotics. The mechanisms by which L. reuteri confers its health-promoting effects are far from being fully understood, but protection of the mucosal barrier is thought to be important. Leaky gut is a state of abnormal intestinal permeability with implications for the pathophysiology of various gastrointestinal disorders. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) can invade the intestinal mucosa and induce changes in barrier function by producing enterotoxin or by direct invasion of the intestinal epithelium. Our hypothesis was that L. reuteri can protect the mucosal barrier, and the goal of the study was to challenge this hypothesis by monitoring the protective effect of L. reuteri strains on epithelial dysfunction caused by ETEC. Using an infection model based on the porcine intestinal cell line IPEC-J2, it was demonstrated that pretreatment of the cells with human-derived L. reuteri strains (ATCC PTA 6475, DSM 17938 and 1563F) and a rat strain (R2LC) reduced the detrimental effect of ETEC in a dose-dependent manner, as monitored by permeability of FITC-dextran and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). Moreover, the results revealed that ETEC upregulated proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFα and decreased expression of the shorter isoform of ZO-1 (187 kDa) and E-cadherin. In contrast, pretreatment with L. reuteri DSM 17938 and 1563F downregulated expression of IL-6 and TNFα, and led to an increase in production of the longer isoform of ZO-1 (195 kDa) and maintained E-cadherin expression. Interestingly, expression of ZO-1 (187 kDa) was preserved only when the infected cells were pretreated with strain 1563F. These findings demonstrate that L. reuteri strains exert a protective effect against ETEC-induced mucosal integrity disruption.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliLimosilactobacillus reuteriAnimalsCell LineEscherichia coli InfectionsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinal MucosaPermeabilitySwineEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)IPEC-J2Lactobacillus reuterimucosal integrity

Identifiers

PMID29368445
PMCPMC5789714
OpenAlexW2787896731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.