Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368399›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2018

Do interindividual differences in cardiac output during submaximal exercise explain differences in exercising muscle oxygenation and ratings of perceived exertion?

Robert F Bentley, Joshua H Jones, Daniel M Hirai, Joel T Zelt, Matthew D Giles, James P Raleigh, Joe Quadrilatero, Brendon J Gurd, J Alberto Neder, Michael E Tschakovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robert F BentleyHuman Vascular Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua H JonesLaboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology, Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel M HiraiLaboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology, Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Joel T ZeltLaboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology, Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew D GilesQueen's Muscle Physiology Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
James P RaleighQueen's Muscle Physiology Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Joe QuadrilateroMuscle Biology and Cell Death Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Brendon J GurdQueen's Muscle Physiology Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Alberto NederLaboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology, Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Michael E TschakovskyHuman Vascular Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable interindividual differences in the Q˙-V˙O2 relationship during exercise have been documented but implications for submaximal exercise tolerance have not been considered. We tested the hypothesis that these interindividual differences were associated with differences in exercising muscle deoxygenation and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) across a range of submaximal exercise intensities. A total of 31 (21 ± 3 years) healthy recreationally active males performed an incremental exercise test to exhaustion 24 h following a resting muscle biopsy. Cardiac output (Q˙ L/min; inert gas rebreathe), oxygen uptake (V˙O2 L/min; breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange), quadriceps saturation (near infrared spectroscopy) and exercise tolerance (6-20; Borg Scale RPE) were measured. The Q˙-V˙O2 relationship from 40 to 160 W was used to partition individuals post hoc into higher (n = 10; 6.3 ± 0.4) versus lower (n = 10; 3.7 ± 0.4, P < 0.001) responders. The Q˙-V˙O2 difference between responder types was not explained by arterial oxygen content differences (P = 0.5) or peripheral skeletal muscle characteristics (P from 0.1 to 0.8) but was strongly associated with stroke volume (P < 0.05). Despite considerable Q˙-V˙O2 difference between groups, no difference in quadriceps deoxygenation was observed during exercise (all P > 0.4). Lower cardiac responders had greater leg (P = 0.027) and whole body (P = 0.03) RPE only at 185 W, but this represented a higher %peak V˙O2 in lower cardiac responders (87 ± 15% vs. 66 ± 12%, P = 0.005). Substantially lower Q˙-V˙O2 in the lower responder group did not result in altered RPE or exercising muscle deoxygenation. This suggests substantial recruitment of blood flow redistribution in the lower responder group as part of protecting matching of exercising muscle oxygen delivery to demand.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputExerciseHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalOxygen ConsumptionPhysical ExertionYoung AdultCardiac outputexercise toleranceinterindividual differencesratings of perceived exertion

Identifiers

PMID29368399
PMCPMC5789726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.