ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2018
Pressure-driven growth in strongly heterogeneous systems.
Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foam-liquid front motion in Eulerian coordinates.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pressure-driven growth model for advance of a foam front through an oil reservoir during foam improved oil recovery is considered: specifically the limit of strong heterogeneity in the reservoir permeability is treated, such that permeability variation with depth more than outweighs the tendency of the net pressure driving the front to decay with depth. This means that the fastest moving part of the front is not at the top of the solution domain, but rather somewhere in the interior. Moreover the location of the foam front on the top boundary of the system can no longer be specified as a boundary condition, but instead must be determined as part of the solution of the problem. Numerical solutions obtained from the pressure-driven growth model under these circumstances are compared with approximate analytic solutions. An early-time approximate solution is found to break down remarkably quickly (far more quickly than breakdown would occur in the analogous homogeneous system). Numerical solutions agree much better with local quasi-static solutions centred about local maxima in the front shape, each local maximum corresponding to a depth within the reservoir at which a high permeability stratum is found. These individual local solutions meet together at sharp concave corners to cover the entire depth of the foam front. As time continues to progress however, the system evolves towards a long-time, global quasi-static solution, corresponding to the fastest moving of the aforementioned local maxima. Additional key features of the predicted front shapes are elucidated. The foam front is found to meet the top boundary obliquely despite an established convention in pressure-driven growth that the front and top boundary should meet at right angles. In addition, at each sharp concave corner, discontinuous jumps are predicted in the path length that material points travel to reach either side of the corner. Moreover the long-time, global quasi-static solution is found to admit smooth concavities, as opposed to the aforementioned sharp concave corners, which only tend to be prominent earlier on.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29368222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.