Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368125›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2018

Overview of Current and Future First-Line Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

David M Gill, Andrew W Hahn, Peter Hale, Benjamin L Maughan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. First-line ICIs in renal cell carcinoma.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Update on the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.World journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M GillDepartment of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Andrew W HahnDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Room 4C104, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Peter HaleDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Room 4C104, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Benjamin L MaughanDepartment of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Benjamin.Maughan@hci.utah.edu.
Huntsman Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementTreatment of metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mccRCC) has seen substantial progress over the last 20 years, with many regulatory approvals since 2006 culminating in a substantial increase to overall survival (OS). Six therapies are currently available for first-line use, with additional treatments currently being tested in this setting, some of which are expected to be approved soon based on new data from the CABOSUN and CheckMate-214 trials. Based on the available evidence, we strongly believe that vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF-TKI) therapy over mechanistic target or rapamycin (mTOR; formerly known as mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor therapy is the most effective first-line option regardless of risk category assignment. High-dose interleukin-2 (HDIL-2) therapy remains a reasonable treatment option in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and have minimal comorbid conditions. In the near future, these agents are likely to be surpassed by cabozantinib and by combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. Independent review has recently confirmed superiority of first-line cabozantinib over sunitinib in a phase 2 trial of 157 patients with intermediate or poor risk mccRCC (progression-free survival [PFS] 8.6 vs 5.3 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, p = 0.0008). In a separate study of 1096 patients treated with either upfront sunitinib or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab, those with intermediate and poor risk had significant improvement in both PFS (11.6 vs 8.4 months, HR 0.82, p = 0.0331) and OS (not reached vs 26 months, p < 0.0001). Responses were greater in patients with positive programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor staining, and pending regulatory approval may become standard of care in untreated patients with intermediate to poor risk disease with positive PD-L1 status. This likely represents the beginning of additional novel immunotherapy combinations for the first-line treatment of mccRCC.

Indexed as

AnilidesCarcinoma, Renal CellHumansKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSunitinibSurvival RateTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnilidescabozantinibMTOR protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesSunitinibTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACheckpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyMetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinomamTOR inhibitorsPredictive biomarkersVEGF-TKIs

Identifiers

PMID29368125
OpenAlexW2788498597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.