ArticlePharmaceutical research2018
Development and performance of npde for the evaluation of time-to-event models.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint modelling and simulation of M-protein dynamics and progression-free survival for alternative isatuximab dosing with pomalidomide/dexamethasone.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Developing Tools to Evaluate Non-linear Mixed Effect Models: 20 Years on the npde Adventure.The AAPS journal · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNormalised prediction distribution errors (npde) are used to graphically and statistically evaluate mixed-effect models for continuous responses. In this study, our aim was to extend npde to time-to-event (TTE) models and evaluate their performance.
methodsLet V denote a dataset with censored TTE observations. The null hypothesis (H
resultsType I error was found to be close to the expected 5% significance level for all sample sizes tested. The npde were able to detect misspecifications in the baseline hazard as well as in the link between the longitudinal variable and the survival function. The ability to detect model misspecifications increased as the difference in the shape of the survival function became more apparent. As expected, the power also increased as the sample size increased. Imputing the censored events tended to decrease the percentage of rejections.
conclusionsWe have shown that npde can be readily extended to TTE data and that they perform well with an adequate type I error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29368033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.