Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368027›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2018

[Implementation of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy according to OPS 8‑918 : Recommendations of the ad hoc commission for interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy of the German Pain Association].

B Arnold, A Böger, T Brinkschmidt, H-R Casser, D Irnich, U Kaiser, K Klimczyk, J Lutz, M Pfingsten, R Sabatowski and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

B ArnoldAbteilung für Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Dachau, Dachau, Deutschland.
A BögerSchmerzzentrum Kassel, DRK-Kliniken Nordhessen, Kassel, Deutschland.
T BrinkschmidtAlgesiologikum, München, Deutschland.
H-R CasserDRK Schmerz-Zentrum Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
D IrnichInterdisziplinäre Schmerzambulanz, Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), München, Deutschland.
U KaiserUniversitätsSchmerzCentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
K KlimczykInterdisziplinäres Schmerzzentrum, m&i-Fachklinik Enzensberg, Hopfen am See, Deutschland.
J LutzInterdisziplinäre Schmerztherapie, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Deutschland.
M PfingstenSchmerzklinik in der Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. michael.pfingsten@med.uni-goettingen.de.
R SabatowskiUniversitätsSchmerzCentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
M SchiltenwolfBereich konservative Orthopädie, Schmerztherapie, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
W SöllnerKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie und Interdisziplinäre Schmerztagesklinik, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Klinikum Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Heidelberg University · DEHelios Amper-Klinikum Dachau · DEKlinikum Kassel · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DELMU Klinikum · DEMedizinisches Versorgungszentrum Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer · DEParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DETU Dresden · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEZentralklinik Bad Berka · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the implementation of the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) reimbursement system in hospitals, interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy was incorporated into the associated catalogue of procedures (OPS 8‑918). Yet, the presented criteria describing the procedure of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy are neither precise nor unambiguous. This has led to discrepancies in the interpretation regarding the handling of the procedure-making it difficult for medical services of health insurance companies to evaluate the accordance between the delivered therapy and the required criteria. Since the number of pain units has increased in recent years, the number of examinations by the medical service of health insurance companies has increased. This article, published by the ad hoc commission for interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy of the German Pain Association, provides specific recommendations for correct implementation of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in routine care. The aim is to achieve a maximum level of accordance between health care providers and the requirements of the medical examiners from health insurance companies. More extensive criteria regarding interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment in an in-patient setting, especially for patients with chronic and complex pain, are obviously needed. Thus, the authors further discuss specific aspects towards further development of the OPS-code. However, the application of the OPS-code still leaves room regarding treatment intensity and process quality. Therefore, the delivery of pain management in sufficient quantity and quality still remains the responsibility of each health care provider.

Indexed as

PainPain ManagementCombined Modality TherapyGermanyHumansAmbulatory careChronic painIn-patient carePain managementQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID29368027
OpenAlexW2787969049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.