Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29368001›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018

Pharmacokinetics, Tissue Localization, Toxicity, and Treatment Efficacy in the First Small Animal (Rabbit) Model of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma.

Anthony B Daniels, Michael T Froehler, Janene M Pierce, Amy H Nunnally, M Wade Calcutt, Thomas M Bridges, David C LaNeve, Phillip E Williams, Kelli L Boyd, Michelle L Reyzer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Advanced Intraocular Retinoblastoma….Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Emerging New Therapeutics for Retinoblastoma.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony B DanielsDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Michael T FroehlerCerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Janene M PierceDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Amy H NunnallyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
M Wade CalcuttDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Thomas M BridgesVanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
David C LaNeveSurgical Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Phillip E WilliamsSurgical Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Kelli L BoydVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Michelle L ReyzerDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Craig W LindsleyVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Debra L FriedmanVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Ann RichmondDepartment of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Training (pp 214-245)P41GM103391 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEY, KEVIN L · 2012 to 2020
$17.7M
Developing alternative approaches to reduce retinal toxicity and prevent vision loss in the treatment of intraocular retinoblastomaK08EY027464 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DANIELS, ANTHONY BRENT · 2017 to 2021
$960k
BLRD VA IK6 BX005225NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NEI NIH HHS K08 EY027464NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Current intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) drug regimens for retinoblastoma have ocular and vascular toxicities. No small-animal model of IAC exists to test drug efficacy and toxicity in vivo for IAC drug discovery. The purpose of this study was to develop a small-animal model of IAC and to analyze the ocular tissue penetration, distribution, pharmacokinetics, and treatment efficacy. Methods: Following selective ophthalmic artery (OA) catheterization, melphalan (0.4 to 1.2 mg/kg) was injected. For pharmacokinetic studies, rabbits were euthanized at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, or 6 hours following intra-OA infusion. Drug levels were determined in vitreous, retina, and blood by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. To assess toxicity, angiograms, photography, fluorescein angiography, and histopathology were performed. For in situ tissue drug distribution, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI-IMS) was performed. The tumor model was created by combined subretinal/intravitreal injection of human WERI-Rb1 retinoblastoma cells; the tumor was treated in vivo with intra-arterial melphalan or saline; and induction of tumor death was measured by cleaved caspase-3 activity. Results: OA was selectively catheterized for 79 of 79 (100%) eyes in 47 of 47 (100%) rabbits, and melphalan was delivered successfully in 31 of 31 (100%) eyes, without evidence of vascular occlusion or retinal damage. For treated eyes, maximum concentration (Cmax) in the retina was 4.95 μM and area under the curve (AUC0→∞) was 5.26 μM·h. Treated eye vitreous Cmax was 2.24 μM and AUC0→∞ was 4.19 μM·h. Vitreous Cmax for the treated eye was >100-fold higher than for the untreated eye (P = 0.01), and AUC0→∞ was ∼50-fold higher (P = 0.01). Histology-directed MALDI-IMS revealed highest drug localization within the retina. Peripheral blood Cmax was 1.04 μM and AUC0→∞ was 2.07 μM·h. Combined subretinal/intravitreal injection of human retinoblastoma cells led to intra-retinal tumors and subretinal/vitreous seeds, which could be effectively killed in vivo with intra-arterial melphalan. Conclusions: This first small-animal model of IAC has excellent vitreous and retinal tissue drug penetration, achieving levels sufficient to kill human retinoblastoma cells, facilitating future IAC drug discovery.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingElectroretinographyFluorescein AngiographyInfusions, Intra-ArterialMelphalanOphthalmic ArteryRabbitsRetinaRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationTissue DistributionTreatment OutcomeVitreous BodyAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID29368001
PMCPMC5783625
OpenAlexW2785220350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.