Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29367797›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Assessing vertebral fracture risk on volumetric quantitative computed tomography by geometric characterization of trabecular bone structure.

Walter A Checefsky, Anas Z Abidin, Mahesh B Nagarajan, Jan S Bauer, Thomas Baum, Axel Wismüller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Walter A ChecefskyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States.
Anas Z AbidinDepartments of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States.
Mahesh B NagarajanDepartments of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States.
Jan S BauerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Thomas BaumInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Axel WismüllerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, New York, United States.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

CRCNS: Large Scale Brain Connectivity in HIV-Related Cognitive ImpairmentR01DA034977 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WISMUELLER, AXEL W.E. · 2012 to 2014
$599k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current clinical standard for measuring Bone Mineral Density (BMD) is dual X-ray absorptiometry, however more recently BMD derived from volumetric quantitative computed tomography has been shown to demonstrate a high association with spinal fracture susceptibility. In this study, we propose a method of fracture risk assessment using structural properties of trabecular bone in spinal vertebrae. Experimental data was acquired via axial multi-detector CT (MDCT) from 12 spinal vertebrae specimens using a whole-body 256-row CT scanner with a dedicated calibration phantom. Common image processing methods were used to annotate the trabecular compartment in the vertebral slices creating a circular region of interest (ROI) that excluded cortical bone for each slice. The pixels inside the ROI were converted to values indicative of BMD. High dimensional geometrical features were derived using the scaling index method (SIM) at different radii and scaling factors (SF). The mean BMD values within the ROI were then extracted and used in conjunction with a support vector machine to predict the failure load of the specimens. Prediction performance was measured using the root-mean-square error (RMSE) metric and determined that SIM combined with mean BMD features (RMSE = 0.82 ± 0.37) outperformed MDCT-measured mean BMD (RMSE = 1.11 ± 0.33) (

Indexed as

biomechanical strength predictionbone mineral densitymulti-detector computed tomographyScaling Index Method (SIM)spinal vertebraesupport vector regressiontrabecular bone

Identifiers

PMID29367797
PMCPMC5777337
OpenAlexW2306074255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.