ArticleStudies in mycology2018
Phylogenetic classification and generic delineation of
Article in Studies in mycology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two new species ofMycoKeys · 2026Article
- Article
- Morpho-phylogenetic evidence uncovers new taxa of lignicolous freshwater Sordariomycetes from Yunnan and Guizhou provinces, China.MycoKeys · 2026Article
- Phylogeny, taxonomy and geographic distribution of novel and known fungi with holoblastic-denticulate conidiogenesis inPersoonia · 2025Article
- IMA fungus · 2025Article
- Re-evaluation ofMycoKeys · 2024Article
- MycoKeys · 2022Article
- Article
- Phylogenetic placement ofFungal systematics and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Phylogeny, Global Biogeography and Pleomorphism ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Morpho-Phylo Taxonomy of Novel Dothideomycetous Fungi Associated With Dead Woody Twigs in Yunnan Province, China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Evidence ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- The root-symbioticStudies in mycology · 2019Article
- Sequence-based nomenclature: a reply to ThinesIMA fungus · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.