Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29367573›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2016

Large Mammalian Animal Models of Heart Disease.

Paula Camacho, Huimin Fan, Zhongmin Liu, Jia-Qiang He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Novel Minimally Invasive Porcine Model of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. From bench to bedside and back: translational cardiovascular interventions in veterinary medicine.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Species Differences of P2X4 Receptor Modulators.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paula CamachoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. pcamacho@vt.edu.
Huimin FanResearch Institute of Heart Failure, Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China. frankfan@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9776-3180
Zhongmin LiuResearch Institute of Heart Failure, Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China. liu.zhongmin@tongji.edu.cn.
Jia-Qiang HeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. jiahe@vt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the biological complexity of the cardiovascular system, the animal model is an urgent pre-clinical need to advance our knowledge of cardiovascular disease and to explore new drugs to repair the damaged heart. Ideally, a model system should be inexpensive, easily manipulated, reproducible, a biological representative of human disease, and ethically sound. Although a larger animal model is more expensive and difficult to manipulate, its genetic, structural, functional, and even disease similarities to humans make it an ideal model to first consider. This review presents the commonly-used large animals-dog, sheep, pig, and non-human primates-while the less-used other large animals-cows, horses-are excluded. The review attempts to introduce unique points for each species regarding its biological property, degrees of susceptibility to develop certain types of heart diseases, and methodology of induced conditions. For example, dogs barely develop myocardial infarction, while dilated cardiomyopathy is developed quite often. Based on the similarities of each species to the human, the model selection may first consider non-human primates-pig, sheep, then dog-but it also depends on other factors, for example, purposes, funding, ethics, and policy. We hope this review can serve as a basic outline of large animal models for cardiovascular researchers and clinicians.

Indexed as

dogheart disease modelnon-human primatespigsheep

Identifiers

PMID29367573
PMCPMC5715721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.