Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29367452›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2018

Systematic Functional Characterization of Human 21st Chromosome Orthologs in

Sarah K Nordquist, Sofia R Smith, Jonathan T Pierce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Vertebrate and Invertebrate Animal Models for the Study of Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah K NordquistInstitute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712.
Sofia R SmithInstitute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712.
Jonathan T PierceInstitute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78712 jonps@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9619-4713
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

High-speed opto-fluidics to screen entire nervous system in aging and diseaseR01AG041135 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEN-YAKAR, ADELA, PIERCE, JONATHAN THOMAS · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Synergistic patterned neurodegeneration by APP and APOE4RF1AG057355 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PIERCE, JONATHAN THOMAS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041135NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with Down syndrome have neurological and muscle impairments due to an additional copy of the human 21st chromosome (HSA21). Only a few of ∼200 HSA21 genes encoding proteins have been linked to specific Down syndrome phenotypes, while the remainder are understudied. To identify poorly characterized HSA21 genes required for nervous system function, we studied behavioral phenotypes caused by loss-of-function mutations in conserved HSA21 orthologs in the nematode

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21MutationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalDown SyndromeGenetic Association StudiesHumansNeuromuscular JunctionOpen Reading FramesPhenotypeRNA InterferenceCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDown syndromeneurologicalneuromuscularsynaptic

Identifiers

PMID29367452
PMCPMC5844316
OpenAlexW2785118435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.