Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29367406›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Cortical Neural Activity Predicts Sensory Acuity Under Optogenetic Manipulation.

John J Briguglio, Mark Aizenberg, Vijay Balasubramanian, Maria N Geffen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Distinct Inhibitory Neurons Differently Shape Neuronal Codes for Sound Intensity in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John J BriguglioDepartment of Physics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology HNS, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.ORCID 0000-0003-0578-3668
Mark AizenbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-0453
Vijay BalasubramanianDepartment of Physics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology HNS, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-6497-3819
Maria N GeffenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and mgeffen@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-2993
University of Pennsylvania · USJanelia Research Campus · US

Funding

Circuit Mechanisms of Sound Processing and Detection in the Auditory PathwayR01DC014479 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEFFEN, MARIA NEIMARK · 2015 to 2024
$4.7M
Neuronal circuits supporting learning-driven changes in auditory perception.R01DC015527 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Maria Neimark Geffen · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
The role of cortical interneurons in auditory processing and learningR03DC013660 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GEFFEN, MARIA NEIMARK · 2013 to 2015
$480k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014479NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015527NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the mammalian sensory cortex form interconnected circuits that control cortical stimulus selectivity and sensory acuity. Theoretical studies have predicted that suppression of inhibition in such excitatory-inhibitory networks can lead to either an increase or, paradoxically, a decrease in excitatory neuronal firing, with consequent effects on stimulus selectivity. We tested whether modulation of inhibition or excitation in the auditory cortex of male mice could evoke such a variety of effects in tone-evoked responses and in behavioral frequency discrimination acuity. We found that, indeed, the effects of optogenetic manipulation on stimulus selectivity and behavior varied in both magnitude and sign across subjects, possibly reflecting differences in circuitry or expression of optogenetic factors. Changes in neural population responses consistently predicted behavioral changes for individuals separately, including improvement and impairment in acuity. This correlation between cortical and behavioral change demonstrates that, despite the complex and varied effects that these manipulations can have on neuronal dynamics, the resulting changes in cortical activity account for accompanying changes in behavioral acuity.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionEvoked Potentials, AuditoryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeural InhibitionNeuronsOptogeneticsauditory cortexbehaviorcomputational modelingexcitatory–inhibitory circuitsfrequency discriminationoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID29367406
PMCPMC5824743
OpenAlexW2953250251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.