Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29367398›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Whole-body photoreceptor networks are independent of 'lenses' in brittle stars.

Lauren Sumner-Rooney, Imran A Rahman, Julia D Sigwart, Esther Ullrich-Lüter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Algal Ocelloids and Plant Ocelli.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Panoramic spatial vision in the bay scallopProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Run and hide: visual performance in a brittle star.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lauren Sumner-RooneyOxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, UK lauren.sumner-rooney@oum.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-5069
Imran A RahmanOxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-6534
Julia D SigwartQueen's University Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, Portaferry, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3005-6246
Esther Ullrich-LüterMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.
Museum für Naturkunde · DEMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoreception and vision are fundamental aspects of animal sensory biology and ecology, but important gaps remain in our understanding of these processes in many species. The colour-changing brittle star

Indexed as

AnimalsEchinodermataExploratory BehaviorImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPanamaPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateTomographyextraocular photoreceptionophiuroidsphotoreceptorssensory biologyvision

Identifiers

PMID29367398
PMCPMC5805950
OpenAlexW2784337763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.