Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29367293›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical microbiology2018

Efficacy of T2 Magnetic Resonance Assay in Monitoring Candidemia after Initiation of Antifungal Therapy: the Serial Therapeutic and Antifungal Monitoring Protocol (STAMP) Trial.

Eleftherios Mylonakis, Ioannis M Zacharioudakis, Cornelius J Clancy, M Hong Nguyen, Peter G Pappas

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Point-of-Care Method T2BacteriaMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel Diagnostic Methods for Infective Endocarditis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eleftherios MylonakisInfectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA emylonakis@lifespan.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-0777
Ioannis M ZacharioudakisDepartment of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Cornelius J ClancyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
M Hong Nguyen *University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Peter G Pappas *University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Brown University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of blood culture for monitoring candidemia clearance is hampered by its low sensitivity, especially during antifungal therapy. The T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR) assay combines magnetic resonance with nanotechnology to identify whole

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsBlood CultureCandidaCandidemiaCandidiasis, InvasiveDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNanotechnologyProspective StudiesYoung AdultAntifungal Agentscandidemiainvasive candidiasismolecular diagnosticsmonitorT2 CandidaT2MR

Identifiers

PMID29367293
PMCPMC5869839
OpenAlexW2794302591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.