Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29366706›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Vaccine financing and billing in practices serving adult patients: A follow-up survey.

Megan C Lindley, Laura P Hurley, Brenda L Beaty, Mandy A Allison, Lori A Crane, Michaela Brtnikova, Megan Snow, Carolyn B Bridges, Allison Kempe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Importance of reasons for stocking adult vaccines.The American journal of managed care · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Megan C LindleyNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: MLindley@cdc.gov.
Laura P HurleyAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Brenda L BeatyAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Mandy A AllisonAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Lori A CraneAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Michaela BrtnikovaAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Megan SnowColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, USA.
Carolyn B BridgesNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Allison KempeAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USDenver Health Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Rapid-Cycle Survey Collaborative for Provider Input on Immunization Issues: Vaccine Policy Collaborative InitiativeU01IP001072 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KEMPE, ALLISON · 2017 to 2019
$1.4M
Rapid-cycle Survey Collaborative for Provider Input on Immunization IssuesU01IP000849 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KEMPE, ALLISON · 2014 to 2016
$1.3M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001938NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000849NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial concerns are often cited by physicians as a barrier to administering routinely recommended vaccines to adults. The purpose of this study was to assess perceived payments and profit from administering recommended adult vaccines and vaccine purchasing practices among general internal medicine (GIM) and family medicine (FM) practices in the United States.

methodsWe conducted an interviewer-administered survey from January-June 2014 of practices stratified by specialty (FM or GIM), affiliation (standalone or ≥ 2 practice sites), and level of financial decision-making (independent or larger system level) in FM and GIM practices that responded to a previous survey on adult vaccine financing and provided contact information for follow-up. Practice personnel identified as knowledgeable about vaccine financing and billing responded to questions about payments relative to vaccine purchase price and payment for vaccine administration, perceived profit on vaccination, claim denial, and utilization of various purchasing strategies for private vaccine stocks. Survey items on payment and perceived profit were assessed for various public and private payer types. Descriptive statistics were calculated and responses compared by physician specialty, practice affiliation, and level of financial decision-making.

resultsOf 242 practices approached, 43% (n = 104) completed the survey. Reported payment levels and perceived profit varied by payer type. Only for preferred provider organizations did a plurality of respondents report profiting on adult vaccination services. Over half of respondents reported losing money vaccinating adult Medicaid beneficiaries. One-quarter to one-third of respondents reported not knowing about Medicare Part D payment levels for vaccine purchase and vaccine administration, respectively. Few respondents reported negotiating with manufacturers or insurance plans on vaccine purchase prices or payments for vaccination.

conclusionsPractices vaccinating adults may benefit from education and technical assistance related to vaccine financing and billing and greater use of purchasing strategies to decrease upfront vaccine cost.

Indexed as

AdultChi-Square DistributionCosts and Cost AnalysisFollow-Up StudiesHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMedicaidMedicarePhysiciansProfessional PracticeUnited StatesVaccinationVaccinesVaccinesAdult immunizationSurvey researchVaccine billingVaccine financing

Identifiers

PMID29366706
PMCPMC5807000
OpenAlexW2793419757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.