Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29366697›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Predicting future learning from baseline network architecture.

Marcelo G Mattar, Nicholas F Wymbs, Andrew S Bock, Geoffrey K Aguirre, Scott T Grafton, Danielle S Bassett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Network architectures supporting learnability.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcelo G MattarDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Nicholas F WymbsHuman Brain Physiology and Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew S BockDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Geoffrey K AguirreDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Scott T GraftonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and UCSB Brain Imaging Center, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Danielle S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: dsb@seas.upenn.edu.

Funding

Virtual Resection to Treat EpilepsyR01NS099348 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, LITT, BRIAN · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Evolution of the Linked Architecture of Network Control and Executive Function in AdolescenceR21MH106799 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2016 to 2017
$515k
CRCNS: US-France Modeling & Predicting BCI Learning from Dynamic NetworksR01HD086888 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH · 2015 to 2018
$506k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086888NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106799NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human behavior and cognition result from a complex pattern of interactions between brain regions. The flexible reconfiguration of these patterns enables behavioral adaptation, such as the acquisition of a new motor skill. Yet, the degree to which these reconfigurations depend on the brain's baseline sensorimotor integration is far from understood. Here, we asked whether spontaneous fluctuations in sensorimotor networks at baseline were predictive of individual differences in future learning. We analyzed functional MRI data from 19 participants prior to six weeks of training on a new motor skill. We found that visual-motor connectivity was inversely related to learning rate: sensorimotor autonomy at baseline corresponded to faster learning in the future. Using three additional scans, we found that visual-motor connectivity at baseline is a relatively stable individual trait. These results suggest that individual differences in motor skill learning can be predicted from sensorimotor autonomy at baseline prior to task execution.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor SkillsNerve NetBrain networksfMRIFunctional connectivityHuman learningMotor learningNetwork science

Identifiers

PMID29366697
PMCPMC5910215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.