Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29366640›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of urology2018

Value of Intact Prostate Specific Antigen and Human Kallikrein 2 in the 4 Kallikrein Predictive Model: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Andrew Vickers, Emily A Vertosick, Daniel D Sjoberg, Freddie Hamdy, David Neal, Anders Bjartell, Jonas Hugosson, Jenny L Donovan, Arnauld Villers, Stephen Zappala and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Novel Agents and Future Perspectives on Theranostics.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew VickersNew York, New York. Electronic address: vickersa@mskcc.org.
Emily A VertosickNew York, New York.
Daniel D SjobergNew York, New York.
Freddie HamdyOxford, United Kingdom.
David NealOxford, United Kingdom.
Anders BjartellLund, Sweden.
Jonas HugossonGöteborg, Sweden.
Jenny L DonovanBristol, United Kingdom.
Arnauld VillersLille, France.
Stephen ZappalaAndover Urology, Andover, Massachusetts.
Hans LiljaNew York, New York.
Andover Eye Associates · USGöteborgs Stads · SE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JAMES A EASTHAM · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Dynamic, multi-cohort prediction modeling of prostate biopsy outcomeR01CA179115 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ANKERST, DONNA PAULER, VICKERS, ANDREW J · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Prospective validation of a multi-marker prostate cancer prediction modelR01CA160816 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BOORJIAN, STEPHEN, COOPERBERG, MATTHEW R · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160816NCI NIH HHS R01 CA179115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 4 kallikrein panel, commercially available as the 4Kscore®, is a statistical model that has been shown to accurately predict Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater (high grade) cancer on biopsy and the long-term risk of distant prostate cancer metastases. The panel includes 2 novel markers, namely intact prostate specific antigen and hK2. It has been questioned whether these 2 additional markers add discrimination to the clinical predictors of patient age, digital rectal examination and prior biopsy, and the established molecular markers total and free prostate specific antigen. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of published studies in which the 4 kallikrein panel was measured in men undergoing prostate biopsy. We assess the improvement in discrimination associated with including intact prostate specific antigen and hK2 along with total and free prostate specific antigen in the statistical model.

resultsIncluded in analysis were 14,510 men from a total of 10 studies. The fixed effects meta-analytical estimate of the discrimination of the model without intact prostate specific antigen and hK2 was 0.742 (95% CI 0.727-0.756) compared to 0.813 (95% CI 0.801-0.825) for the full kallikrein model. The 95% CIs did not overlap and the difference in discrimination was highly statistically significant (0.069, 95% CI 0.057-0.080, p <0.0001). Intact prostate specific antigen (increase in discrimination 0.059, 95% CI 0.050-0.069) and hK2 (increase in discrimination 0.024, 95% CI 0.020-0.029, each p <0.0001) added independently to the model.

conclusionsThe clinical value of the panel could not be replicated using data readily available to urologists without measuring intact prostate specific antigen and hK2.

Indexed as

Digital Rectal ExaminationEarly Detection of CancerHumansKallikreinsMaleNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsTissue Kallikreinskallikrein 4KallikreinsProstate-Specific AntigenTissue Kallikreinsdigital rectal examinationearly detection of cancerkallikreinsprostate-specific antigenprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29366640
PMCPMC6596413
OpenAlexW2784674734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.